Theforeigner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 1,838
- Reaction score
- 1,048
Hi, theforeigner. No need for apologies. There is a difference between wading ever deeper into a marshy thicket and seeing what has settled into its tangles. The investigators didn't try to get across; that would have told them nothing. And what would it have told us? That it would have been foolish for a woman who has already run from help more than once to attempt to cross to the other side?
Chandler
A woman had gone missing.
This very woman had called 911 screaming somone wanted to KILL HER!
This very woman banged on several houses doors sceaming somone wanted to kill her!
Witnesses claimed they saw her disappear at the marsh area.
A man was following her in his car (MP)
SO!!!!!! the police's job was INDEED to get into that very area and look for her! IF it was possible that she could have been in there.
They DID NOT!!!
WHY?
Because, in their own words, it was impossible to enter the area because of TOO MUCH water and owergrown.
AND Dormer today said that they didn´t, also, because they "didn't think it was necessary".
Now WHY is THAT???
Well probably because they KNEW that it was IMPOSSIBLE for anybody to enter that marsh area, because of, YEP; TOO MUCH water and owergrown, brambles etc etc etc.
This is my last efford to try make you think reasonable concerning this issue.