Desdemona
* * * * Desi * * * *
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2011
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 1
BBMYou are absolutely correct in saying that a severe head injury can cause death. IMO, GZ didn't have anything close to a severe head injury and according to Gilbreath, his story of getting his head smashed over and over on the sidewalk in inconsistent with the evidence they found.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1204/20/cnr.02.html (just in case)
The only fact that either one of us can clearly agree on, is that we don't know how he got those scratches on his head. They could be there for any number of reasons.
IMO it might be *possible* that Gilbreath's assertion about "inconsistent with evidence" could refer instead to the part of his response immediately preceding -- the bit about GZ saying the shot was fired just after he tried to "scoot" to get his head away from the concrete:
Gilbreath: His injuries are consistent with trauma to the back of his head, yes.
O'Mara: Okay. What are those injuries?
Gilbreath: Pardon me? His injuries? There's two lacerations to the back of his head.
O'Mara: Okay. Did you identify what caused those lacerations?
Gilbreath: No.
O'Mara: Um, could it have been from having his head bashed on the ground, as he testified to?
Gilbreath: He suggested, I don't know [if?] "testified to,"
O'Mara: I'm sorry, told you about,
Gilbreath: He mentioned that his head was being physically bashed against the concrete sidewalk, and that he, this was just prior to him firing the shot, and that he, he was, managed to scoot, away from the concrete sidewalk, and that is, at that point is when the, shooting subsequently followed. Um,that is not consistent with the evidence we found."
O'Mara: The injuries seem to be consistent with his story though, don't they?
Gilbreath: The injuries are consistent, consistent with a harder object striking the back of his head? than his head was.
O'Mara: Could that be cement?
Gilbreath: Could be.
O'Mara: Uh, did you just say it wasn't consistent, or that it was?
Gilbreath: I said it was.
http://www.wral.com/news/video/11004815/#/vid11004815
In other words, the part that Gilbreath says is inconsistent with evidence *might* not be the bashing part, but the "scooting" part instead; his answer (BBM) is a bit disjointed and does not clearly answer the question posed IMO. Ah well, we'll surely figure out more as soon as we learn exactly what GZ told LE, and what the evidence shows IMO.
my transcript
JMO
docs docs docs docs docs docs docs docs lease: