AZ - Isabel Mercedes Celis, 6, Tucson, 20 April 2012 - #16

Status
Not open for further replies.
It maybe another drug ring, it don't have to be the cartels, there are a lot of drug groupies that get ugly. Drugs are ugly and make people ugly and do crazy things.
Did anybody else follow the "hinky meter forum" all I know is the main person doing it told one of the posters to email them before they keep going on with the investigation, then it got shut down. I wonder if the girl poster was on to something. Very interesting!

:welcome:


No, I didn't read anything about the "Hink Meter Forum". Maybe you can tell us what you learned...
 
Wouldn't there be an arrest if a cadaver dog hit in the house? Just wondering. LE keeps saying they have no reason to think Isabel is not alive. I don't think they would say that if the dogs smelt death. Idk this case is so crazy!!!

I don't think a hit from a dog is enough. Police say the cadaver dog hit in the home where baby Lisa disappeared 7+ months ago and no one has been arrested.
 
Wouldn't there be an arrest if a cadaver dog hit in the house? Just wondering. LE keeps saying they have no reason to think Isabel is not alive. I don't think they would say that if the dogs smelt death. Idk this case is so crazy!!!

BBM

Who would they arrest - the whole family???
 
In order to proceed with thinking about gun/drug cartels, one would have to dismiss the dog hit inside the house. I am going with cadaver (I know we were not told, but that seems logical). If you learned a cadaver dog hit inside the home, would you change your theory about the financial situataions and reasons other than pedophile/abusive motives?

I might. But not necessarily solely due to a cadaver hit... which is terribly up in the air at this point. Not all cartel actions go as planned, so that doesn't de facto rule out that angle.

Money, from non-tax reported sources, often equals illegal gains. Whether as a CI, gambler, or gun runner. It could also be sloppy tax prep. A cadaver hit equates to a deceased body. Either need to be verified.

He77, I hope I am wrong on all counts. I hope she is found no matter how/why she went missing. But I also hoped all of our POWs would be accounted for. So... yeah.
 
My first post, bear with me.
In keeping with theories related to criminal associations (cartels and/or F&F), could SC's 911 call demeanor be attributed to the possibility that Isabel's "abduction" was arranged with the knowledge of SC to provide protection for Isabel and not for financial gain? RC's initial distress heard in her 911 conversation on 4/21/12 was significantly tempered when she appeared publicly during the couple's first (and subsequent) press conferences. IMO, information revealing greater details about Isabel's disappearance may have been shared with RC.
Simply, my opinion.

:welcome: Spice-Nine.

I'm reading backwards...
 
whoa hinky is gone??? that is a bit scary
 
I know that it has been referenced that LE took scenthounds and a cadaver dog into the Ceils' house, but is it known if these types of dogs were taken into their cars ?

Why has it never been mentioned if and where scenthounds tracked Isabel's scent to the last known place where she was ? TIA if anyone either knows or has a good guess...

JMO

One of the big mysteries, liz. :waitasec: I suspect the tracks didn't go very far off the property...and LE isn't sharing that info...YET.
 
I never understood the suspicion about Diena given the facts as known and given how LE was treating her. Similarly, I didn't understand why Ed Smart was given so much grief given the known facts and LE reaction. As with many other cases where the parents were suspected online but treated by all accounts as victims by LE.

While I look at the known facts in these cases, I tend to follow LE's lead while also watching how LE conducts the investigation. In the ones I listed above and in this one, LE seems to be open to all avenues. They don't seem to have 'tunnel vision' (I term I tend to loathe, as it is brought up in some cases MONTHS after LE exhausts multiple channels to focus on one path). And in this case, LE, in recent days, despite the multiple paths they have exhaustively looked into...seem to be putting pressure on SC. That, coupled with his very odd 911 call, leads me to believe they suspect he played a direct part in whatever happened to Isabel.

However, it could be that the 911 call and the CPS/no contact stuff are both connected to a 'habit' that has nothing to do with Isabel and that other 'clues' by LE (the searches in the wash right by the baseball field) have to do with things unrelated to SC.

But I follow LE, and despite their 'don't take this to be related' protestations in regards to the CPS deal, their actions (releasing the 911 calls right after, the search in the wash) tell me something different.

My opinion could change tomorrow, depending on what LE does. All of this is simply that, my opinion, and I continue to hope in this case that LE is competent and doing a good job for Isabel...and despite my own opinions, I am always interested in what others have to say, as it makes me think and question and reason, which is a good thing.

Logical, intelligent post. Thank you.

I would put any type of Cartel at 100-1

An RSO or unregistered SO at 10-1

A sometime workman at the Celis' house at 10-1

A young male neighbor at 5-1

Accident at 50-1

JMO

By accident, do you mean accident in the course of abuse? Because it is not that easy to unintentionally kill a child that age via negligence, at least when compared with a baby or toddler. Kids that age don't get rolled over on during the night, or drink tons of drain cleaner, or fall of a changing table, etc., ya' know?

I have been reading this forum for along time now. You all have great ideas on this case. This is my scenario. I have read a lot about this case and watched a lot of news and read in a lot of other forums and trying to put things together, this is my opinion.
#1. I think this has to do with drugs and the cartel, or any other drug ring that is linked to this family, on another forum somebody posted SC criminal background and on that it had "proof of income" so that raised a red flag, I am sure he was some kind of dealer.
#2. On another thread somebody close to the family said SC was talking to somebody at the game the night before and heard him say " he is going to get his", who would he be talking about? Maybe somebody threating him to pay up.
#3. I think his 911 was weird but maybe he didn't want to bring attention to this situation and thought they would bring her back.
#4. I think cps jumped in cause his family was in danger,the drug cartel is not a world to get involved with. And if your father is involved in any drug ring you should have your kids taken away.
#5. Even if he failed a polygraph which we don't know yet, it might be cause he failed to keep his family safe. He is guilty,guilty, guilty.
I really don't think SC just decides one night to rape, molest, and kill his daughter. I have 4 kids 3 boys and 1 girl and my husband said " what would be the worst thing somebody could do to me?" take my daughter!! Not saying that if our boys were abducted he wouldn't be sad, or hurt but " daddy's protect their daughters." The drug cartels are not dumb. You take what's closest to you.
That's my first scenario. My second is UNCLE JUSTIN!! To many red flags with him.
But authorities say taking a child is rare!! Really? Thats all we ever hear about.. It happens all the time. People are getting crazier and crazier all the time. Think about all the stuff we don't hear about state to state, country to country.

:fireworks::welcome::fireworks:

About the proof of income thing. That is common. The actual term on the docket is "failure to provide evidence of financial responsibility". That simply means he was uninsured and thus cannot show that he has the financial ability to cover injuries or damages to another person or vehicle he may be involved in an accident with. That's all that means.

Sergio's criminal history is mostly just driving violations. Nothing too major. He did get a DUI but the "drugs,vapors" thing doesn't mean he was guilty of all. It is just a general label that means he was pulled over and assessed by LE to be under the influence of alcohol, OR drugs, OR some kind of "huffing" substance like glue or whatever.

His DUI charge was dismissed which some think indicates something sinister. It doesn't. My law partner does hundreds of DUI cases each year. He gets loads of them dismissed. It can be easy to do, depending on the circumstances. (Blood alcohol levels being on the margin, timing of test, etc.).

I have no issues with the cartel angle, it just happened to be one of the comments she made. I think it's a perfectly reasonable theory, and I don't even have a local point-of-view.

- It just bothers me that so many are treating the statements about the dogs and male voices as gospel. It may ABSOLUTELY be true, but with a healthy dose of skepticism, I'd like to hear from someone else too. It just seems unlikely that she'd be the only one to hear the dogs if they were putting up the fuss she said they were. I have 2 dogs that live next to me that are barkers, but I can tell their different types of barking and know when to check on them. :) I haven't seen where LE said anything about the voices or the barking, but I definitely could have missed - I need a race car to keep up with these threads - lol.

I have no reason to think the neighbor is lying. But, she could be mistaken or what she observed meant little. She could be off on the time, as she was asleep when awakened by the noise and could have been groggy. Or, it could simply have been laborers in the alley.

I think Isa was gone before her mom woke up. I think Isa was taken from that house before then. The neighbor's info is important but may not be relevant. :moo:

It's been hugely unpopular to post this, and I have received a smackdown for even suggesting it, but to me, it is far more likely that this was an inside job engineered as some sort of way to make money rather than an outside cartel abduction.

I'll repeat what was reported weeks ago: LE was interviewing the kids' friends to see what they might have been discussing in the week before Isa went missing. I thought that was interesting and potentially significant.

I think that's standard practice. they want to know, did the child make any statements about someone bothering her? Did she make any weird statements about going on a trip? Did she or any of her friends notice someone staring or following? I don't see anything but standard practice in regards to that.

My first post, bear with me.
In keeping with theories related to criminal associations (cartels and/or F&F), could SC's 911 call demeanor be attributed to the possibility that Isabel's "abduction" was arranged with the knowledge of SC to provide protection for Isabel and not for financial gain? RC's initial distress heard in her 911 conversation on 4/21/12 was significantly tempered when she appeared publicly during the couple's first (and subsequent) press conferences. IMO, information revealing greater details about Isabel's disappearance may have been shared with RC.
Simply, my opinion.

:fireworks2::welcome4::fireworks2:
 
In order to proceed with thinking about gun/drug cartels, one would have to dismiss the dog hit inside the house. I am going with cadaver (I know we were not told, but that seems logical). If you learned a cadaver dog hit inside the home, would you change your theory about the financial situataions and motives associated with that?

I would think that if a cadaver dog hit then TPD would be classifying this as a homicide. AFAIK, LE are looking at ALL possibilities, which include theories she is alive or was at least taken by whomever while alive. JMO
 
It maybe another drug ring, it don't have to be the cartels, there are a lot of drug groupies that get ugly. Drugs are ugly and make people ugly and do crazy things.
Did anybody else follow the "hinky meter forum" all I know is the main person doing it told one of the posters to email them before they keep going on with the investigation, then it got shut down. I wonder if the girl poster was on to something. Very interesting!

:welcome:


No, I didn't read anything about the "Hink Meter Forum". Maybe you can tell us what you learned...
The person was from Tucson and talking a lot of what she was hearing. I really can't remember word for word and I have read so much since that, it was strange cause it was all wiped out. I wish now I would have screen captured the forums! It was a lot about polygraph test etc...
 
Wouldn't there be an arrest if a cadaver dog hit in the house? Just wondering. LE keeps saying they have no reason to think Isabel is not alive. I don't think they would say that if the dogs smelt death. Idk this case is so crazy!!!

No, Cadaver dogs can hit on scent only...w/o any leakage or DNA around. The scent of a dead body is fresh for a few weeks..but will dissipate slowly after that...from what I read. I am speaking of a deceased person being in a home and removed.

They cannot arrest on scent only. They need hard evidence.
 
After some careful google earth fly over navigating and looking at veiw angles, I might have a possible lead to ponder.... There is a Computer Repair Shop in the shopping center to the NorthEast of the Celis residence with a good veiw from the rear of the store. It's not that unusual for a pc tech to be at work at all hours of the night working to get stuff done and they might have been stalking the home... never know when it comes to techie's..
 
I would think that if a cadaver dog hit then TPD would be classifying this as a homicide. AFAIK, LE are looking at ALL possibilities, which include theories she is alive or was at least taken by whomever while alive. JMO

Can't get jurors to believe anything about dogs as we all know from the CA case. LE needs the body...heck, even that doesnt work half the time.
 
A fully developed adult cadaver left outside in the hot weather will fully skeletonize in two weeks....amazing!
 
Well, you guys are doing some good sleuthing...that's for sure. I will leave this investigating up to all of you as I need some sleep.

:eek:fftobed:
 
What about the surveillance? Does anyone think they have more? All we ever heard was in the beginning? Do you think they saw other vehicles there. I thoughT that would for sure gEt who is responsIble for this.
 
Mr. Moore of Moore Security stated that the cameras captured activity in Moore's alley, and the street. He never says the cameras are on the house. He says the cameras are trained on his own alley, not the Celis' alley. Two different alleys.
While his cameras can capture 12th street it would be to the East of the Celis home. There is a two story house between Moore and the Celis home.

Here is the clip of him on NG.

Police are sifting through surveillance video - YouTube

http://www.mooresecuritysolutions.com/rick-moore-speaking-with-nancy-grace-on-hln
Here's the company FB
https://www.facebook.com/AVSSUSA
 
Mr. Moore of Moore Security stated that the cameras captured activity in Moore's alley, and the street. He never says the cameras are on the house. He says the cameras are trained on his own alley, not the Celis' alley. Two different alleys.
While his cameras can capture 12th street it would be to the East of the Celis home. There is a two story house between Moore and the Celis home.

Here is the clip of him on NG.
http://www.mooresecuritysolutions.com/rick-moore-speaking-with-nancy-grace-on-hln
Here's the company FB
https://www.facebook.com/AVSSUSA


yeah, there maybe a 2 story home between Moore and Celis' but there aint nothing blocking the veiw from Bluechip Computer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
1,673
Total visitors
1,752

Forum statistics

Threads
594,457
Messages
18,005,743
Members
229,400
Latest member
roseashley592
Back
Top