Sidebar Discussion #12

Status
Not open for further replies.
BBM yet it's ok for Ashton?


This chaps my hide too. I still have doubts that Amanda is innocent. I think she should give half the money to the Kerscher family. Whether she is guilty or innocent she is still making money off of a murdered young woman which I think is wrong. Amanda should be greatful she is free and home in the states. In fact, she should donate all of it. Half to charity and half to the Kerschers. Oh well, I can dream!
 
sorry for the o/t but...

evidently Brodsky isn't the scapegoat in this one - it's Greenberg... Ell Ohh Ell!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-drew-peterson-fires-lawyer-who-opposed-savio-divorce-lawyer-as-witness-20120911,0,5205957.story


(not that I'm surprised)


Momma! I was reading at a blog I like and I knew the photo in the most recent post looked familiar. Check it out..its your sig pic with Kate Gosselin photoshopped in..

http://www.realitytvkids.com/2012/09/all-rise-court-is-now-in-session.html?m=1
 
Momma! I was reading at a blog I like and I knew the photo in the most recent post looked familiar. Check it out..its your sig pic with Kate Gosselin photoshopped in..

http://www.realitytvkids.com/2012/09/all-rise-court-is-now-in-session.html?m=1

mutley1.jpg


Yowza! I am so glad somebody gets it.

My 'berry - smashing to see you.
 
"The rain ...falls upon the just and the unjust alike; a thing which would not happen if I were superintending the rain's affairs. No, I would rain softly and sweetly on the just, but if I caught a sample of the unjust outdoors I would drown him."
- Mark Twain​

0ea9e62fd6fe529a1006407c4f58944c.jpg

~Caylee's Tree~​

Image: http://bit.ly/OrnQ53
 
"The rain ...falls upon the just and the unjust alike; a thing which would not happen if I were superintending the rain's affairs. No, I would rain softly and sweetly on the just, but if I caught a sample of the unjust outdoors I would drown him."
- Mark Twain​

0ea9e62fd6fe529a1006407c4f58944c.jpg

~Caylee's Tree~​

Image: http://bit.ly/OrnQ53

Now that - is a brilliant post Desdemona......
 
Whoopsie Jose!

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #40,415 in Books (See Top 100 in Books) :seeya:
 
Florida has no income tax. It has property taxes. Only residents in Orange County, and only those who own property contributed to what the defense team was paid.

If you're in Floria you did.
 
Off the DEATH of a child, yes, IF they are getting paid for what they write. Whether it is a member of the prosecution, the defense, or the accused, yet found not guilty, mother of the child.

:what:

Wait...is it your opinion that every single person who writes about this trial is making money off a murdered child?
 
The argument of profiting off the death of a child by writing a book is, in my opinion, ridiculous. Are we saying NOTHING should ever be written EVER about a dead person so that nobody makes any money? Ever? Really?

wow. way to promote censhorship.
 
Florida has no income tax. It has property taxes. Only residents in Orange County, and only those who own property contributed to what the defense team was paid.

You don't get money transfers back from the Feds? Whoa - way to always stay in the red...
 
Off the DEATH of a child, yes, IF they are getting paid for what they write. Whether it is a member of the prosecution, the defense, or the accused, yet found not guilty, mother of the child.

But there are many who have written articles, books, theses, etc on deaths of children. Children who die, usually do so unnaturally and/or tragically. Much can be learned from those who have worked with such cases. Medically, spiritually, legally. Why does this case warrant special judgement?
 
Off the DEATH of a child, yes, IF they are getting paid for what they write. Whether it is a member of the prosecution, the defense, or the accused, yet found not guilty, mother of the child.

I believe the books are about the mother who was accused of killing her child so it would be the mother who bears the responsibility for the death of her child. Any money she makes or her family has made through the child's name would be considered "making money off the dead child." Everyone else is making money off the trial of the accused mother. There is a big difference. If it were not for the mother there would have never been any money to have been made by anyone. Now wouldn't that have been nice. jmo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
2,757
Total visitors
2,864

Forum statistics

Threads
595,690
Messages
18,030,207
Members
229,730
Latest member
wulongfei125
Back
Top