LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 29
ITA Lambchop! As far as the threats against ALV go. that would be considered witness tampering would it not? That's a huge deal where I live and I'm sure the US legal system is the same. No witnesses=no case. And ALV is an expert witness which should have made the threats against her, assuming there were any at all, even more offensive to the court. The threats would have been investigated and the offender charged. The fact this is such high profile case and yet these threats were allowed to hang in the air at trial then dissolve into nothing after the fact, makes them highly suspect. The alleged threats to Patty, the buddy with a criminal record of own would have been equally offensive to the court.
I suspect she did lie about Locks of Love. If not to the court, then to Locks of Love. They don't accept bleached hair even if it was dyed back and I somehow doubt the jail takes on the process and expense of cutting and delivering inmate hair to charities. Her hair was long enough to donate at trial and yet she didn't. It was long enough after trial and during all the court appearances she's had to date leading up to her next trial and yet she hasn't even had it cut it seems, let alone donated to Locks of Love.
It would be interesting to see if her T shirts resulted in one red dime going to the shelter she testified they were supporting too. I somehow doubt they did.
Perhaps her family members might rise to the occasion to plead for her life this time around but other than that I agree she's got nothing.
The difference is this time around JM can dispute those claims because he will be prepared. There is nothing to mitigate. jmo