I would be interested in knowing if those mistakes happened after or before the girls were taken. If after the public may never know if any of these mistakes were with the evidence collected at Myers Lake or Seven Bridges.
snipped for focus by CB
Even though it was mainly Misty and Dan on the drug end, this family was intertwined because of drugs, i.e. Aunt Tammy and her kids, Uncle 'Miah and his friends. I think Heather and Drew would be eager to help someone in need and that someone could be exactly the person who would take advantage of their kindness by taking these girls from them.
The only time I felt less confident in the FBI was when they were the ones to state that the girls were alive. That was a very bold statement to make without them even knowing where the girls were. Every one is human, we all make mistakes.
Thank you Grainne Dhu! You make an excellent point as always. Good to see you back in action! I agree the FBI would have discounted no one. We see cases end where the perpetuator was on "the list" from the beginning, and then there are those rare cases where the perpetuator was never on the radar.
P.S.: Run Bambi Run! Just kidding of course...
The only time I felt less confident in the FBI was when they were the ones to state that the girls were alive. That was a very bold statement to make without them even knowing where the girls were. Every one is human, we all make mistakes.
Yes, that was the moment in the investigation I literally shook my head and said "huh?" And the FBI has made some mistakes...
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fb...s-in-nearly-all-trials-before-2000/ar-AAbgTt6
And then there was this (not FBI, but still wth?):
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/State-Crime-Lab-Fires-Worker-After-Noting-Errors-186401141.html
Argggh! This all brings me back to I think Lyric and Lizzy's case was bungled from the beginning...
I can't be so sure things were handled correctly straight out the shoot...and this falls on Edale Pd.
We know from the family that after the girls bikes were found, THAT VERY NIGHT - Tammy claims that once they took down the tape her and the familtwent into the wooded area and "did their own investigation".
IMO there are no two ways about it, that was a HUGE mistake on LE's part.
At that point they likely had no idea about Dan or Misty or Tammy's background, nor did they think the girls were abducted. Drew claimed to have identified the bikes.
Did he also participate in the investigation of the wooded area as well?
My point being...theoretically speaking...if ANY evidence on the back end maybe tied anyone familial to their disappearance - them being in that woods shot that proof to hell of putting anyone at the scene of abduction for a prosecuting attorney.
"They were all there...AFTER their bikes were found"...says the defense attorney.
And Lord only knows how many "volunteer searchers" who could ALSO have been the perp can explain why their DNA or scent etc was found at that location.
I make no qualms about saying this...LE screwed up big time on that piece.
Hopefully there would be plenty more evidence at Seven Bridges....but Meyers Lake is a bust IMO.
I can't be so sure things were handled correctly straight out the shoot...and this falls on Edale Pd.
We know from the family that after the girls bikes were found, THAT VERY NIGHT - Tammy claims that once they took down the tape her and the familtwent into the wooded area and "did their own investigation".
IMO there are no two ways about it, that was a HUGE mistake on LE's part.
At that point they likely had no idea about Dan or Misty or Tammy's background, nor did they think the girls were abducted. Drew claimed to have identified the bikes.
Did he also participate in the investigation of the wooded area as well?
My point being...theoretically speaking...if ANY evidence on the back end maybe tied anyone familial to their disappearance - them being in that woods shot that proof to hell of putting anyone at the scene of abduction for a prosecuting attorney.
"They were all there...AFTER their bikes were found"...says the defense attorney.
And Lord only knows how many "volunteer searchers" who could ALSO have been the perp can explain why their DNA or scent etc was found at that location.
I make no qualms about saying this...LE screwed up big time on that piece.
Hopefully there would be plenty more evidence at Seven Bridges....but Meyers Lake is a bust IMO.
That sort of evidence wouldn't have much value in a heavily used public space like that anyway. It could have been there from the day before, or the week before.
Is scent evidence allowed in trials in Iowa? I'm pretty sure it's not in MA. It's just an investigative tool, like polygraphs.
Because the perpetrator likely had detailed local knowledge, I think he will be on one or more lists but probably not near the top. That's why I'm trying to think of additional lists to compile. Even if he's not near the top on the one list he's on, if LE comes up with additional categories to list and he pops up there, then being on more lists will automatically move his name up overall. If you see what I mean.
I really wonder if the perp is someone who moved away from the Waterloo/Cedar Falls metro area before the girls were abducted. Say he moved away between 2005 and 2010. That would be long enough ago that his name would not pop up as a resident but recent enough that all his local knowledge would still be relevant.
The problem with that theory is that I don't see any easy way to compile a list of names from it. It's a metro area, people move away all the time and particularly since the time period includes the economic crash, the number of people moving (both in and away) would have been even higher.
I was just thinking the same thing......One way to sleuth would be to look at friends of the family who have moved away--not everyone in Waterloo. (since most of the time it is someone the victim knows) There seems to be a big Florida connection for the family.
I've had my eye on someone who was a long-time local and childhood friend of one of the parents, would have known the area inside and out, had substance abuse and mental health issues and some mild trouble with the law in Waterloo but was able to talk his way out of. He moved away a few years before the girls went missing--but came back regularly to see old friends and family (a small circle) He has had some trouble with the law down in his new state, but always seems to be able to escape accountability- He seems like the kind of person who is often enabled by family members and close friends (he doesn't have very many)--like "yeah, he's weird/struggling/mentally ill, but he's basically harmless." He also was back in town during the time frame the girls went missing and then out of state right after again. He has a relationship to the Collins. I called it in a long time ago and so did another Websleuther. I sure hope they took it seriously, because I'm stuck on him. He reminds me of the creepy younger killer in Silence of the Lambs--just a weird dude, not many close friends, anti-social behavior. I'm actually going to call him in again. They should see if he ever was in treatment as the same place as Klunder.
I won't give anymore details, because I don't want to get in trouble. But yeah, people close to the family who may have grown up there and moved away.