Midge Montana
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 2,653
- Reaction score
- 4,540
I had to chuckle at the post above that wondered if the only fingerprints on the receipt were Papaw's.
Seriously, HCSO couldn't even be bothered to subpoena BC's phone records, canvass neighbors, canvas businesses for CCTV footage, and about a million other things, because you know, no crime was committed. Does anyone seriously think they'd fingerprint a receipt?
They are hoping and praying this doesn't get solved, it seems to me, because they sure didn't try some of the most basic (and inexpensive) means to INVESTIGATE. Meeks says, no crime. End of story. Nothing to see here. Move along now please...
Seriously, HCSO couldn't even be bothered to subpoena BC's phone records, canvass neighbors, canvas businesses for CCTV footage, and about a million other things, because you know, no crime was committed. Does anyone seriously think they'd fingerprint a receipt?
They are hoping and praying this doesn't get solved, it seems to me, because they sure didn't try some of the most basic (and inexpensive) means to INVESTIGATE. Meeks says, no crime. End of story. Nothing to see here. Move along now please...