SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,208
- Reaction score
- 175,123
Click the link, Iailwa (https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/5b174043e4b087b8baa89a5d)
there's an ex tempore judgment to the effect that elements of a defamation claim are to go to trial.
Interesting though that the judge said that care must be taken with applying the precedents to this case. The bit about 'because it is implied that you are a pedo does not necessarily imply that you are a criminal, if you haven't committed a criminal act' (my words).
I think Spedding's lawyer is trying to say that the DT is defaming Spedding by implying he is a pedo, William is missing, there is a search for a deceased body, Spedding is a POI ... so Spedding did it.
I know that some of us think it is possible he did it, but that is more due to the totality of things we have been told, particularly about the alibi and the apparent phone calls and his not being cleared after that. imo