It is NOT evidence at all. Fiber evidence so obviously could be planted, now that all crooks probably know there is such a thing as fiber evidence. Maybe it used to be somewhat reliable before it became well-known. Criminals now are forewarned. They can even plant DNA, I heard on TV. It is true that evidence can be planted. But lets look at it. JonBenet was not found until 1:00 that afternoon. In the time that she got home and was found, nobody was there, (or at least if they were, they LEFT NO FIBERS AT ALL, and no evidence of their being there), except the parents, the brother and in the early hours, their friends, the Reverend and the police and then the FBI. So a reasonable person would not assume that any of these people planted the fibers under the tape over JonBenet's mouth. And they were all fingerprinted and ID'd, ETC. And another assumption would be that possibly an intruder did it and planted the evidence - however, there is NO EVIDENCE of an intruder. So a more logical assumption is to start looking at the parents and once we start looking at the parents, circumstantial evidence starts looking very incriminating.
This is very basic common sense. Yes, it is very basic common sense Eagle. Basic. There is NO evidence, hard or soft, that the R's, or anyone else acting alone did it. There is a plethora of evidence that implicates the Ramseys - the fibers in the garrotte, on the tape, in the paint box, the note, the handwriting analysis - the note pad found in their house - the practice note - which Patsy admits to writing several days early and looks exactly like the Ransom Note salutation - the fact that she slips up in her interviews with "John called me from the basement", the fact that she saw the red heart "THAT MORNING" and is emphatic about that, and then retracts that statement the next morning- there is more, but this will do for now. The very strong harp evidence we still have, tho' I doubt Janet still has the harp. Wouldn't you get rid of it? Anyone seen any picture of the harp? The harp! Yes, I am blown away by it. It is such concrete evidence. Much like the pagans in Colorado.
Again, nobody here is saying McReynolds did it, much less that he did it by himself acting alone. I believe more than one person was involved, maybe several more. Who?
I have to agree with whoever said he may have died of guilt, although he seemingly had none at the time of the statement to Daniel Glick. There had to be some kind of consciousness-raising later, by his getting questionned I guess, but not thoroughly enough. There has to be SOME explanation for the names on that celtic (magic, they believed/believe) harp. Possibly the victim kids were told it had some kind of magical powers, and they were led right over the edge into the next world. What????
My search revealed that ancient celts-druids sacrificed children in foundations of new buildings for good luck. We can't know there's no madman trying to resurrect such practices, who may have studied mind control, or may just have an uncanny knack, like Charles Manson, I know I've said before, but so have you said these things about the R's before, so I'm certainly not the only one repeating myself too much if I am. I don't even have an opinion.
It's my tentative personal opinion that some mad man was in the Philippines, rejected by JR, who messed with this group's minds and caused all this. I may even have heard about present-day adult Christians who died, maybe of malpractice, at times, because someone had maliciously given them a bad "reputation", by maybe bribing false witnesses as in 2000-yr old cases we've been taught about as kids in Sunday School. History repeats itself. Sociopaths, some woman wrote that I found in a search one time, don't know if it's still there, are always failures, seeking to make others failures, projecting their guilt burdens on them, skilled liars, they're so motivated by their own guilts.
We don't know much about "reverse speech", or whether it's at all reliable but years ago it was said JR's reverse speech said to JonBenet, "So now we must hate you." Could be a hi-jacked scripture verse was fraudulently misused, for instance the one about Whoever would come after me, not exact quote, or whatever man tries to serve two masters, he will love one and hate the other. Someone also perverts the forgiveness scriptures who whines that he's going to be sued, seems to get some churches to harp on it, out of context and for wrong purposes, instead of him just stopping whatever he's doing to others who ought to sue him. If you ever buy the tabloids advertising their versions of prophecy, was such a person ever predicted? I think they just make up their own version, don't you? No scriptures about the final anteChrist's teaching hatred in the house of his God. We've heard of enough sociopaths to know it very well could happen.
Some artist at the university had done a malicious picture of JonBenet, which he was made to take down from exhibiting on a wall. You are referring to the student who did this. And, so it is juvenile and it is indifferent and it is selfish and it is crude, but IT IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING BUT EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. Why do you read so much into everything. I don't remember the source, maybe Schiller. There was malicious talk about her by perverts and all those Barbie dolls, on the lawn if I remember correctly. Plenty of other evidences someone else was involved, tho' he may not have been there in person. As Manson never was, and claimed he was therefore innocent.
