Further to the above posting:
I live about 15-20 minutes NE of Devon, and I drove over to volunteer in the search two Saturday’s after Kathleen disappeared, only to find out they had closed the HQ and were organizing via the Facebook page from that point onward. But even two weeks later, Kathleen’s tire tracks were still visible in the meridian between the north- and south-bound lanes.
For those who don’t know the area, the highway is divided by a meridian approximately two and half to three car widths across at the widest section. The highway is 80 km/h through Devon, then turns roughly westwards and heads down a long hill until it gets to the bridge and then heads northwest across the bridge. The speed limit is 100 km/h down the hill, but having driven this route many times, I can tell you it is really easy to go much faster!
Two weeks after she disappeared, I could see Kathleen’s tire tracks in the snow of the meridian. She had clearly been driving down the hill on the northbound lane and instead of making the slow turn of the highway northwestwards towards the bottom of the hill, her tracks entered the snow of the meridian. The snow was approximately 35 cm deep (a foot or more)…maybe a little more.
From the looks of her tracks, Kathleen’s car continued in the meridian for quite a ways (approximately 5 to 6 car lengths), and then it looked like it must have spun around and stopped facing southeastwards closer to the southbound lanes. When her car was towed away, they took it out on the southbound side.
It’s just my opinion here, but I think the snow was too deep for any car to have pulled out of the meridian on its own once in it, unless it’s a 4x4.
Of course, what the tracks don’t tell us is what happened for Kathleen to have driven into the ditch in the first place.
In my opinion, it can be one of three possibilities:
1) Kathleen accidentally drove off and got stuck. This could easily happen. The road has a slow bend on that hill, and the tracks entered the meridian approximately where the highway starts bending. It’s dark…the highway is fast and on a hill…it’s winter and possibly slippery…it’s very easy to accidentally hit the soft snow of the meridian and get pulled into it.
2) Kathleen deliberately drove into the meridian to park. Again possible, but not really a practical or common sense first choice. There is an access road running parallel to the northbound lane that leads to a large parking lot for the park/picnic area/campground along the river under the bridge. If someone wanted to head to the bridge at night, I think one would most likely be inclined to head to this area and then climb the embankment to the highway/bridge. The highway is not pedestrian friendly in any way. And if Kathleen wanted to head to the bridge for her own reasons that night, why not pull over on the right hand shoulder, the open side of the bridge, and most natural pull-over side for drivers in North America?
3) Kathleen was nudged off the road by someone else. This may seem a little far-fetched. I am no traffic investigator and certainly don’t know what sort of tracks would have been made if this had occurred. Also, we have no idea about what shape Kathleen’s vehicle was in, if there was a dent or collision marks, etc. But I seem to recall someone in Saskatchewan years ago who used to have “accidents” with single women drivers along country highways in order to force a contact with them/offer assistance or ride.
Again, just my speculation.