Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #15 *ARRESTS*

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just realized something. When I read in the court documents about FD letting the kids drive his Porsche in the driveway, I was thinking a driveway just a few feet long. I guess it doesn’t make a huge difference but I bet the driveway was much longer than a few feet.
 
And one more thought...also in FD’s sister’s letter, she talks of how he wanted to be a father and caretaker from a young age. Thinking of that and his desire to win and be better than others, maybe his consuming passion to provide for the sister and his family is actually about his need to be a better caretaker and parent-like figure than she was—not saying she was bad but that he felt he had to prove he’s better. IMHO.
 
And one more thought...also in FD’s sister’s letter, she talks of how he wanted to be a father and caretaker from a young age. Thinking of that and his desire to win and be better than others, maybe his consuming passion to provide for the sister and his family is actually about his need to be a better caretaker and parent-like figure than she was—not saying she was bad but that he felt he had to prove he’s better. IMHO.
He "said" he wanted to be a caretaker. Big difference from actual genuine feelings. It is part of the mask to say you want to be like this. It is the cloak of normalcy and fooling people about who you really are. Likely, he told JD these very things about being a father because he was after her money and knew these words would get to her. I don't believe the sister for one minute that he had these thoughts at a young age. He may have told the sister recently that he had these thoughts even back then because he is invested in making her believe there is good in him. I also don't believe there is any consuming passion to take care of people in Greece. He gets something out of whatever he does for them. And whatever he has given, I am sure he has received way more benefits, ie: money laundering, etc.
 
Spoiled, Selfish, Feeling entitled, Mean, Dishonest, Uncaring, No Empathy, No affect,
Poor character development, no conscience.
what am I leaving out in describing FD?
He's all the things your mother would have warned you about.

So of course he put on an act for JD. He temporarily became what he thought she wanted him to be. Just long enough to get the
marriage legal and the twin anchor babies
born.
Then all bets were off. He could relax. He
firmed up the money stream from FIL, HF.
His behavior slowly deteriorated to his normal
ways. Out to get whatever he could for himself.
His type never change, they just change victims.
MT, are you reading this?
 
Encore @Alwaystyping!

KS’s body language and facial expressions at FD’s arraignment/bail hearing had about them echos of a Tarantino audition. MT presumably watches TV and surfs the internet as well, so I can’t see any way that she or her attorney would NOT note the riptide undercurrent attendant with Team FD courtroom drop-in at MT’s recent Lady Madonna appearance.

I agree with @afitzy that the NCO was clearly broad, requested by MT through her attorney, and specifically noted that members of FD’s legal team including its attorneys, agents, and representatives, were not to conduct nor attempt direct or indirect communications (such as through third parties or intermediaries.

KS’s pop-up court appearance might as well have been a drive by flash mob in terms of signaling. KS fell within (and violated) the clear intent and spirit of the court order barring contact attempts.

Why not just send the copy guy from next door (or, as afitzy noted, wait for the court hearing transcript to come out) were it authentically casual and meant simply to report back on the hearing and provide an update to the defense team re MT hearing? KS did not need to personally appear in court for Team FD to provide Mr. Grinch with a vigorous proactive defense. (Odds on the pop in winding up on the defense bill? What a coincidence that KS just happened to be at the courthouse on an unrelated matter, know the MT hearing was to be underway at the exact time and in which courtroom, and decide oh hey, how about I just drop by to visit some old friends right here?)

Well, because none of those other means like the copy guy next door or a court transcript or news feed would likely seem in real time, or perhaps at all, very menacing as concerns the strategic targeted messaging directed to/for the public’s consumption and, moreover, MT.

No rules: just reminders. Of who is in charge here. FD is boundary testing — boundary violating — it is business as usual. Is the bench, through inaction, enabling the normalization of tactics in state court? IMO this is a terribly dangerous and toxic strategy the bench may be incentivizing by not calling this out. I hope that the prosecutor and MT’s attorney move for sanctions against the defense team or the court, by its own action, find KS in contempt of its prior order against FD and his team re no contact of MT. KS’s action was neither innocent, accidental, nor innocuous. The absurdity of this situation shocks the conscious and strikes at the core of the public’s faith in our legal system.

So beyond the fact the court did not call this out and haunt the proceedings to memorialize on the record the violation of FD’s counsel and direct the bailiff or Marshall to have KS escorted off the courthouse premises for the day. This infraction NP will claim would be much ado about nothing, but for sure the violation of the NCO is not nothing unless the court fails to take notice and act. If the court does not publicly censure, sanction, or reprimand FD’s attorney/s for this, one must ask oneself what on earth does the NCO mean, what was it for, and why did the court even bother to issue such an order had it no intention of enforcing the order?

KS’s gallery visit reminds me of FD’s “innocent” “accidental” slip into NY with the Waze excuse. Both were very much strategic and deliberate, all can rest assured. FD just popped in to NY despite being barred from leaving CT. MT totally blew the conditions of her release that her attorney negotiated on MT’s behalf to spend two weeks on effective house arrest in NY and which the court in fact granted, but so much for that. What a waste of extremely strained court time and resources and a face slap to JD and the larger community!

FD and MT have lied and conned and partied and skied.

Now they want to skate, too, just like always, it seems.

Thanks for all the info and updates on the cameras in the park and NC politics, government, security, process, and decision making @afitzy

And for the JD blog post excerpts about her loving and devoted King Charles Spaniel. Beautiful words. And such sweet creatures.

@Daisyeve you are right on: dogs really can sniff out a rat.

(or a wolf in ski clothing)

Had the internet been around in public use back when JD and FD were at Brown, I’m betting FD would have targeted whoever was the mark who offered the most for FD to gain.

He goes for the brass ring. It doesn’t matter to him which side it’s on.

By 2003 FD would’ve been able to more easily clandestinely research which person in his universe presented for him the best ROI. He wasted no time in executing his plan.

He is so calculating. In every sense of that word.

IMO/JMO/MOO
*ETC stratification to strategic (grrr autocorrect)
 
Encore @Alwaystyping!

KS’s body language and facial expressions at FD’s arraignment/bail hearing had about them echos of a Tarantino audition. MT presumably watches TV and surfs the internet as well, so I can’t see any way that she or her attorney would NOT note the riptide undercurrent attendant with Team FD courtroom drop-in at MT’s recent Lady Madonna appearance.

I agree with @afitzy that the NCO was clearly broad, requested by MT through her attorney, and specifically noted that members of FD’s legal team including its attorneys, agents, and representatives, were not to conduct nor attempt direct or indirect communications (such as through third parties or intermediaries.

KS’s pop-up court appearance might as well have been a drive by flash mob in terms of signaling. KS fell within (and violated) the clear intent and spirit of the court order barring contact attempts.

Why not just send the copy guy from next door (or, as afitzy noted, wait for the court hearing transcript to come out) were it authentically casual and meant simply to report back on the hearing and provide an update to the defense team re MT hearing? KS did not need to personally appear in court for Team FD to provide Mr. Grinch with a vigorous proactive defense. (Odds on the pop in winding up on the defense bill? What a coincidence that KS just happened to be at the courthouse on an unrelated matter, know the MT hearing was to be underway at the exact time and in which courtroom, and decide oh hey, how about I just drop by to visit some old friends right here?)

Well, because none of those other means like the copy guy next door or a court transcript or news feed would likely seem in real time, or perhaps at all, very menacing as concerns the strategic targeted messaging directed to/for the public’s consumption and, moreover, MT.

No rules: just reminders. Of who is in charge here. FD is boundary testing — boundary violating — it is business as usual. Is the bench, through inaction, enabling the normalization of **** tactics in state court? IMO this is a terribly dangerous and toxic strategy the bench may be incentivizing by not calling this out. I hope that the prosecutor and MT’s attorney move for sanctions against the defense team or the court, by its own action, find KS in contempt of its prior order against FD and his team re no contact of MT. KS’s action was neither innocent, accidental, nor innocuous. The absurdity of this situation shocks the conscious and strikes at the core of the public’s faith in our legal system.

So beyond the fact the court did not call this out and haunt the proceedings to memorialize on the record the violation of FD’s counsel and direct the bailiff or Marshall to have KS escorted off the courthouse premises for the day. This infraction NP will claim would be much ado about nothing, but for sure the violation of the NCO is not nothing unless the court fails to take notice and act. If the court does not publicly censure, sanction, or reprimand FD’s attorney/s for this, one must ask oneself what on earth does the NCO mean, what was it for, and why did the court even bother to issue such an order had it no intention of enforcing the order?

KS’s gallery visit reminds me of FD’s “innocent” “accidental” slip into NY with the Waze excuse. Both were very much strategic and deliberate, all can rest assured. FD just popped in to NY despite being barred from leaving CT. MT totally blew the conditions of her release that her attorney negotiated on MT’s behalf to spend two weeks on effective house arrest in NY and which the court in fact granted, but so much for that. What a waste of extremely strained court time and resources and a face slap to JD and the larger community!

FD and MT have lied and conned and partied and skied.

Now they want to skate, too, just like always, it seems.

Thanks for all the info and updates on the cameras in the park and NC politics, government, security, process, and decision making @afitzy

And for the JD blog post excerpts about her loving and devoted King Charles Spaniel. Beautiful words. And such sweet creatures.

@Daisyeve you are right on: dogs really can sniff out a rat.

(or a wolf in ski clothing)

Had the internet been around in public use back when JD and FD were at Brown, I’m betting FD would have targeted whoever was the mark who offered the most for FD to gain.

He goes for the brass ring. It doesn’t matter to him which side it’s on.

By 2003 FD would’ve been able to more easily clandestinely research which person in his universe presented for him the best ROI. He wasted no time in executing his plan.

He is so calculating. In every sense of that word.

IMO/JMO/MOO
*ETC stratification to strategic (grrr autocorrect)
Those who under estimate the power of a criminal court judge do so at their own peril. FD and his lawyer may be testing the waters, but they will discover they are in pot of boiling water if they rile this judge.
 
IMO Judge Heller had an extremely well-funded litigious sociopath/malignant narcissist on her hands, one who delighted in "gaming the system." For an example of how such individuals manipulate their due process rights to a fair hearing, look no further than Ted Bundy. He played the judicial system up until the day he was executed. Such people relish the fight, and see themselves as intellectually and morally superior to mere judges. They are also the perpetual victims of an "unfair system" stacked against them, at least in their sick minds.

I believe Judge Heller was letting FD know in no uncertain terms that she saw through his charade. No one would ever believe his ridiculous claim that he was unaware she was the wife of the attorney he tried to hire. Conflicting judges and lawyers out like this is an old, sleazy trick which is well-known in the legal community. Reputable litigants and their lawyers know better. The judge knew exactly what FD was trying to do, and she making clear that she wasn't going anywhere. FD was NOT going to run her off the case.

She must have done something right for him to pull the stunt he did, one stunt among many. He had to have known that his recusal scheme was really going to tick her off, but proceeded with it anyway. She was holding him accountable for his conduct, something that must have come as a shock to him.

Is the family law system broken? Many people believe it is. Even in DV court, it is not at all unusual for the victim to be "asked" to agree to a mutual injunction against both parties, even though such an agreement precludes the victim from possessing a firearm. Non-custodial parents routinely disobey their financial obligations, fail to pick up and return children as agreed upon, or decide not to pick the child up at all, often with few consequences. Judges do the best they can with what they have. This is not meant as an excuse, but it is the reality in most states.

FD pulled a LOT of stunts in the divorce case, and fully played everyone, his lawyers included (who, by the way, are bailing on his all of cases, like rats jumping off a sinking ship). Judge Heller was in a position of trying to balance FD's claimed rights, the rights of JD, and the rights of the children. Although I have not read the voluminous pleadings filed in the dissolution, it does seem that the judge was at least trying to hold FD accountable for his many, many efforts to subvert the process. He was doing everything he could to get his way, fairness be damned.

Sadly, FD's wealth buffered him against the consequences of his actions, and allowed him to display just enough of a veneer of respectability to convince others of his good intentions. He was demanding his rights as a parent, without any intention of respecting the rights of JD or her children. While JD was doing everything in her power to comply with the judge's orders, FD was cheating, lying, and concealing the truth at every available opportunity.

Agree on all. The CT family courts are just not well equipped to deal with sociopaths who don't hesitate to blatantly lie under oath, miss every deadline for disclosure, etc. It must be so frustrating for the judges who can intuit what is going on but run out of time to actually deliver true justice. My own divorce decree is a perfect exhibit of this.
 
Those who under estimate the power of a criminal court judge do so at their own peril. FD and his lawyer may be testing the waters, but they will discover they are in pot of boiling water if they rile this judge.
Forgive my legal ignorance . Luckily I have never needed to hire a defense attorney or really known anyone who has . My question is about the judge ... When FD goes back to court on Aug.2 will he likely be seeing the same judge ? The first judge he saw was a woman and second a man . So is just luck of the draw ?
 
Spoiled, Selfish, Feeling entitled, Mean, Dishonest, Uncaring, No Empathy, No affect,
Poor character development, no conscience.
what am I leaving out in describing FD?
He's all the things your mother would have warned you about.

So of course he put on an act for JD. He temporarily became what he thought she wanted him to be. Just long enough to get the
marriage legal and the twin anchor babies
born.
Then all bets were off. He could relax. He
firmed up the money stream from FIL, HF.
His behavior slowly deteriorated to his normal
ways. Out to get whatever he could for himself.
His type never change, they just change victims.
MT, are you reading this?

Can I ask? I wonder what her parents thought about him. I hope this remark isn’t me sleuthing against the rules.
 
As far as FD telling JD about MT moving into the home with them, a guy like him says outrageous things like that without ever intending to follow through. It is part of psychological terrorism. And because JD had come to know what he is capable of, anything was possible. And because of the contempt he had for JD, knowing that he was using HER money to carry out an affair, that was a thrill for him. The ultimate payback for standing in his way.

Dang, your posts keep resonating with me - you know of which you speak! Time has distanced/softened me from this type of psychological terrorism you so aptly describe, but in the heat of a volatile separation it is only too real.
 
Can I ask? I wonder what her parents thought about him. I hope this remark isn’t me sleuthing against the rules.
JD's friend said in msm that her parents
"didn't know what to make of him."
that says a lot, imo. Says they thought he was
strange or not the normal kind of guy they're
used to being around or that JD would be
dating. they were scratching their heads on
FD.
 
Can I ask? I wonder what her parents thought about him. I hope this remark isn’t me sleuthing against the rules.
This is what I think. JD was probably at the point of wanting to find a husband and have children. She was getting to an age where it would be more and more difficult. Voila, here comes FD. Prayers are answered...a man who wants to commit and loves children. Her parents were probably wary but didn't say too much because, you know, JD is an adult, she is happy and they are happy for her. I can't even believe the financial entanglements HF and GF had with him. Pretty sure they wanted to keep the peace and help JD. I think at least one of the parents started to be suspicious early on probably. I have often wondered about the co-signing of the house at 4JC. Were not JD assets and FD business enough to get their own mortgage? That would set off alarm bells to me. If 4JC is too expensive to get on their own, why not stay where they are at or lower in price? A con artist wants to get you in deeper and deeper with them financially so when the end comes, they have their hooks in you. Did JD even want that house? And how in the world do you approach your parents/in-laws to co-sign for that amount? Even if they are rich. I am sure that some time before JD left, her parents realized she and they had been used in the worst way.
 
Thanks for sharing. Wonder where the other three partners are and how many press inquiries they have responded to already with "no comment"

Thanks for the interesting article! How about the line from FD on his construction business "It's not about the money, but about building something that's lasting and that they can be proud of." Nice try FD.
Maybe you guys have read this article about FD in which he talks about himself and the company before but I haven’t. I found it interesting.

http://www.foregroupinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/HartMag10.pdf

Thanks for the interesting article! I just came across this link(perhaps already posted) and FD has a little cameo at 1:09. He builds home that "better the people" that live in them. Too bad this theory didn't work for you FD. Not for nothing, if I'm going to spend loads of money on a home in the middle of nowhere, at least throw in a pool.
 
As far as I can tell from the docket (and I’m no expert at reading those especially from another area), Smith had no court case there at that time. MOO. I could be very wrong.
You are correct. I'm not 100% on that search function of court schedule but I searched on Pattis and Smith and found ZERO! IMO this was a weak attempt at manipulation of MT and intimidation in what can only be described as
'thuggish' behavior. PS. Not sure thuggish is a word but I think most people know what I was going for here!
MOO
 
Last edited:
Forgive my legal ignorance . Luckily I have never needed to hire a defense attorney or really known anyone who has . My question is about the judge ... When FD goes back to court on Aug.2 will he likely be seeing the same judge ? The first judge he saw was a woman and second a man . So is just luck of the draw ?
Wish an atty could hop on and answer this but here is my best guess. The first atty (female) in Norwalk Courthouse I believe was the Judge that set bail. The case was then moved to Stamford Courthouse and new judge was assigned. I believe for sake of continuity that we will continue to see the same Judge that we last saw in court with FD.
 
This is what I think. JD was probably at the point of wanting to find a husband and have children. She was getting to an age where it would be more and more difficult. Voila, here comes FD. Prayers are answered...a man who wants to commit and loves children. Her parents were probably wary but didn't say too much because, you know, JD is an adult, she is happy and they are happy for her. I can't even believe the financial entanglements HF and GF had with him. Pretty sure they wanted to keep the peace and help JD. I think at least one of the parents started to be suspicious early on probably. I have often wondered about the co-signing of the house at 4JC. Were not JD assets and FD business enough to get their own mortgage? That would set off alarm bells to me. If 4JC is too expensive to get on their own, why not stay where they are at or lower in price? A con artist wants to get you in deeper and deeper with them financially so when the end comes, they have their hooks in you. Did JD even want that house? And how in the world do you approach your parents/in-laws to co-sign for that amount? Even if they are rich. I am sure that some time before JD left, her parents realized she and they had been used in the worst way.
Totally agree. But I keep wondering about the fact that there was a very real wealth disparity in the relationship why was there no prenup that we have heard about in Family Court. Wonder if this was a source of anger in the family as well. Just keep thinking about this point and with the level of wealth involved within the family that a prenup would have been standard operating procedure. MOO but I'm baffled...was this a complete snow job by FD?
 
Dang, your posts keep resonating with me - you know of which you speak! Time has distanced/softened me from this type of psychological terrorism you so aptly describe, but in the heat of a volatile separation it is only too real.
Agree with both of you that punishment and revenge were the primary motivators of FD and getting money without having to work was just a bonus. MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
183
Guests online
4,363
Total visitors
4,546

Forum statistics

Threads
592,381
Messages
17,968,240
Members
228,763
Latest member
MomTuTu
Back
Top