cazador
Well-Known Member
Did Robert ever get the Dog out of Jail ?
Does he have it now ?
Does he have it now ?
What secretive new relationship? Link please?barb loved that dog.
he wouldn't walk it.
everyone can take away from that very different things.....
this fits along side with her secretive newly re-established relationship with her son and barb having speaker phone conversations only.
pattern behaviour.
moo
I would think LE is taking all concerns that family have seriously, and I hope they are following through with any leads that may bring.This is LE's exact predicament as far as they have shared with me (which isn't much at all). Just because someone is suspicious doesn't mean they are a killer.
Personally I am not saying that either. I am saying there is more to the story of Barbara's disappearance, which he knows, that he has not shared. It is time to share the details, everything from what they ate for breakfast to showing the public and the media the photos he took on the day she went missing. That will do a lot more than love notes to get me to believe his account of events.
The photos are part of an active investigation. That is why LE is not sharing them. IMHOI would think LE is taking all concerns that family have seriously, and I hope they are following through with any leads that may bring.
If Robert knows anything at all, it would be in his best interest to tell them everything. If he doesn't want to share the information with the public that's understandable. It's probably better to let LE handle it.
Maybe there is a reason they have chosen not to share the photos of her there on that day. What that could be I have no idea. Imo
never said new.What secretive new relationship? Link please?
I thought I read up thread that BT only communicated with her son via E-mail.
You're saying it was by speaker phone. Which one is correct?
The dog walking means absolutely nothing to me. JMO
I'd like to offer up a calibrator for some of our speculations. I posted this resource upthread, and it's so incredibly useful, here it is again:
https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov
This is the FBI's "Crime Data Explorer". You can look at crime stats in Arizona as a good directional calibrator.
Some interesting points that surprisingly validate the notion of an abduction on the highway, and point out it's highly improbable a 72 year old man had anything to do with this disappearance:
Arizona
All violent crimes victims demographics
Location type - Residence home came in #1, with Highway or Street #2
Victim’s relationship to the offender - Stranger #1 by far, and spouse came in far behind stranger at #5
About 80% of offenders are men,
Top three weapons used in crime: Personal weapons, Knife, Handgun
Offense linked to other offenses: 1)Destruction of property 2)Weapon law violation 3)Kidnapping /abduction
Homicide
Circumstances: 1) UUnknown 2)Arguments 3)Narcotics
Murder weapon 1)Handgun 2)Other firearms 3)Other - knives, etc.
Victim’s relationship to Perp: 1)UUnknown 2)Acquaintance 3)Stranger 4)Girlfriend 5)Wife
Perp - Age 70-79 - (Far less than 1.0% at 0.2380952380952381)
I encourage you to look through this FBI database on crime stats in Arizona.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Sorry I misunderstood your post. I thought that the "newly re-established relationship" with her son and the speaker phone were connected.never said new.
the sentence said.....secretly newly re-established.
what link would you like?
her son has put this info out there.
I never said barb spoke to her son on speaker phone. please don't add things to my posts that are not correct.
I said barb has speaker phone conversations only. (from VI)
Yes, they are, but it has been suggested that they may help the public in some way, and therefore help with the investigation.The photos are part of an active investigation. That is why LE is not sharing them. IMHO
RT wont walk the dog.
Okay, I'm convinced he's guilty.
Yes, they are, but it has been suggested that they may help the public in some way, and therefore help with the investigation.
I imagine if LE felt they could help, they would release them.
I just wanted to comment on that one thing. Your post did make me learn a new word. I've never heard the word "taxonomic" used before so I looked it up.Don't take just one thing off the list. This was taxonomic. Look at the whole picture. If you can. It's way more relevant to solving a case than picking one thing off the list. MOO.
Wow..........
BBMbarb loved that dog.
he wouldn't walk it.
everyone can take away from that very different things.....
this fits along side with her secretive newly re-established relationship with her son and barb having speaker phone conversations only.
pattern behaviour.
moo
BBMDid Robert ever get the Dog out of Jail ?
Does he have it now ?
Couldn't Robert just share the pictures with the public if he chose to?Not necessarily. In my years of working with LE, I'd say the tide has firmly gone in favor of "Speak nothing." If it's a potential criminal case (POTENTIAL), then it's all evidence and the public doesn't get it until a judge decides and it's presented in front of a jury.
BTW, in California, DA's and judges and Public Defenders will see and hear **way** more evidence and detail than the jury will hear. Any problematic evidence will be thrown out. No prosecutor wants a shred of relevant evidence thrown out. Ever. So...it must be treated as non-public.
Even if it's partly exonerating to a party, it still stays quiet. That's just how it works. It's really a nail-biting experience for those who are onlookers (or who may be witnesses or know more about the case than the press states).
I know as much and as little as you do. All I have is conjecture. So... IMHO, LE is being very close-mouthed. And I interpret that to mean that they don't feel as though they need the public's help. I get a definite "we got this" vibe from their silence.Yes, they are, but it has been suggested that they may help the public in some way, and therefore help with the investigation.
I imagine if LE felt they could help, they would release them.
Good question.^^^Couldn't Robert just share the pictures with the public if he chose to?
Can't blame RT for not talking to the media. I would rather hear what LE has to say these days.
sorry ranch I have been looking for you.Sorry I misunderstood your post. I thought that the "newly re-established relationship" with her son and the speaker phone were connected.
Any link that you want to use that supports your facts works for me. Thanks.
Well LE isn’t going to say a thing, unless it serves a particular purpose.
If that’s what anyone is waiting for, don’t hold your breath.
The best way to keep this case alive in the media, is for her husband to appear in front of the cameras.