Ok. So that’s interesting. It seems like the defense doesn’t have much here except conjecture to “prove” someone else (KK) may have killed Kelsey on another day, elsewhere.
If the jury can set aside their disgust of KK and use logic, and assess the actual evidence, the case is pretty clear and there’s no whodunnit.
Any other narrative involving tying her up or drugging her and then somehow collecting her on another day and dragging her out (all without detection or any sort of container apparent) to kill her some other time, is fanciful and illogical. IMO. There’s obviously no evidence that comes close to allowing for such a narrative. The jury just needs to be able to apply common sense and logic.
And even if there was such a possibility, the evidence shows PF would’ve been part of that murder narrative. Inextricably linked as a conspirator. Because someone had to be there on Thanksgiving to tie her up or drug her and await the big bad executioner, KK. The only person to do that would be PF. And he was communicating with her during the crucial time periods and involved in clean up.
So even if there was some evidence that it wasn’t he who wielded the bar or plunged the knife or whatever, (which there isn't) he’d still be guilty of murder.
Btw what an absolute idiot. “I didn’t think this would blow up so big.” Typical. I think Watts felt the same way. They don’t have normal human feelings and have disdain for their victims so they can’t imagine anyone caring.
Stupidity and evil. Bad combo.