theshadow45
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,034
- Reaction score
- 10,555
Bumping.
OK OK - Patricia Taylor, 14, Tulsa County, 1 Jan 1980
- Thread starter rainwater
- Start date
theshadow45
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,034
- Reaction score
- 10,555
Bumping for Patricia.
Alleykins
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 6,324
- Reaction score
- 11,667
Patricia's DNA profile was recently updated to include a close paternal relative, making it stronger. I would hope if this was her, it would have hit already, because they both have DNA in the system. But, I always say, when in doubt, submit (if it hasn't been already).
chaddylex
Verified local - Rebecca Stahl case
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2008
- Messages
- 3,134
- Reaction score
- 6,399
I just looked on the Campbell County Jane's NamUs page and Patricia is not ruled out.
theshadow45
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,034
- Reaction score
- 10,555
Patricia has been missing for 38 years today.
theshadow45
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 5,034
- Reaction score
- 10,555
Bumping for Patricia, today is her birthday.
Happy Birthday Patricia.
It's so sad that she was shuffled around within the system so much. I hope she somehow managed to make a stable life for herself.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 35,557
Happy Birthday pretty girl!!
Current list of exclusions for Patricia per NamUs:
UP8761 11/14/2007 Pottawatomie OK
UP2813 07/10/1991 Union AR
UP1579 01/01/1985 Campbell TN (link not accessible)
UP15630 07/03/1984 Cuyahoga OH (link not accessible)
UP46 10/05/1980 Clark NV
UP6796 11/18/1985 Alleghany VA
UP6642 08/07/1986 Chesterfield VA
UP6661 02/03/1991 Stafford VA (link not accessible)
UP6629 02/03/1991 Frederick VA
UP8493 12/06/1993 Fairfax VA
UP6150 11/07/1998 Stafford VA
UP8419 01/16/2001 Isle of Wight VA
UP12683 06/06/2014 Newport News VA
Current list of exclusions for Patricia per NamUs:
UP8761 11/14/2007 Pottawatomie OK
UP2813 07/10/1991 Union AR
UP1579 01/01/1985 Campbell TN (link not accessible)
UP15630 07/03/1984 Cuyahoga OH (link not accessible)
UP46 10/05/1980 Clark NV
UP6796 11/18/1985 Alleghany VA
UP6642 08/07/1986 Chesterfield VA
UP6661 02/03/1991 Stafford VA (link not accessible)
UP6629 02/03/1991 Frederick VA
UP8493 12/06/1993 Fairfax VA
UP6150 11/07/1998 Stafford VA
UP8419 01/16/2001 Isle of Wight VA
UP12683 06/06/2014 Newport News VA
carbuff
Well-Known Member
An aside for people who don't know: Link not accessible usually means that UID was identified as somebody else.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 35,557
carbuff
Well-Known Member
Thank you @carbuff !! I wasn't sure how to relay that without adding a paragraph-long footnote to each list of exclusions(or 'rule-outs', R/Os ??? ) ... I guess I'm still not sure exactly how to post the list ...
I haven't figured out a way to copy the list cleanly. Usually I copy it into a text editor and massage it by hand to make it presentable. That's why I'm so behind on the longer lists. If it's just a few names, I'll just retype. I've seen people take screenshots and post those. While it might be nice to have some consistency in how we do it, the important thing is that the information is maintained here, because pages and lists and even websites (like NAMPN) disappear all the time.
And I've seen all those terms used interchangeably. I tend to use ruleouts, but now that I have a MacBook and spellcheck keeps turning it to "rollouts," I may change that.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 35,557
That makes sense @carbuff. I am usually on my mobile phone and do the same - copy, paste and then I have to edit it. (I'm sure there's a way to 'post with/without formatting' from my phone, I just haven't figured it out) Then I go back and attach links to the actual NamUs profiles and edit a little bit. But it's a little different when I do it from my desktop. lol, It's time-consuming but I don't mind doing it. It has exposed to me cases I wouldn't have otherwise seen.
I'm also not sure exactly what others can and cannot see. Depending on what country they're in or what operating system, etc. they're using (compared to my own). I've seen a couple of other people who post screenshots and whatnot and I have shied away from the 'bigger' cases or ones with longer lists, but I agree with you about some consistency. Also about the main goal is to share the information.
I will help however I can even if that means leaving the 'rule out/exclusion/RO' lists to the professionals! Please message me if there's anything I can do to help you! I'm very much accepting of constructive criticism!
I appreciate you!
I'm also not sure exactly what others can and cannot see. Depending on what country they're in or what operating system, etc. they're using (compared to my own). I've seen a couple of other people who post screenshots and whatnot and I have shied away from the 'bigger' cases or ones with longer lists, but I agree with you about some consistency. Also about the main goal is to share the information.
I will help however I can even if that means leaving the 'rule out/exclusion/RO' lists to the professionals!
Please message me if there's anything I can do to help you! I'm very much accepting of constructive criticism! I appreciate you!
Verity1215
Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2019
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 29
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 10,443
- Reaction score
- 35,557
@Verity1215 welcome to Websleuths! and Patricia's thread!
The Jane Doe you mentioned is not on the list of excluded comparisons to Patricia. (I quoted a previous post that I happened to add just prior to yours with the current list of rule outs that NamUs has for her).
If you are able to create a username and password (REGISTER) on www.namus.gov , you can view the list... they will be under 'comparisons'.
FWIW (for what it's worth), I think the Jane Doe you mentioned is a good possibility! I'm not able to go back over all the details of Patricia's case right now, but at first glance, I think it's worth submitting!
Let me know if I can help you with anything, although I am new to Websleuths also!
Verity1215
Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2019
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 29
@Verity1215 welcome to Websleuths! and Patricia's thread!
The Jane Doe you mentioned is not on the list of excluded comparisons to Patricia. (I quoted a previous post that I happened to add just prior to yours with the current list of rule outs that NamUs has for her).
If you are able to create a username and password (REGISTER) on www.namus.gov , you can view the list... they will be under 'comparisons'.
FWIW (for what it's worth), I think the Jane Doe you mentioned is a good possibility! I'm not able to go back over all the details of Patricia's case right now, but at first glance, I think it's worth submitting!
Let me know if I can help you with anything, although I am new to Websleuths also!
View attachment 218929
Thank you so much for the welcome! I got myself set up, thank you for the tip. When you say it’s worth submitting, in what way do I do that? Can you tell I’m totally new to this?!?! Lol thanks for any help or pointers you can give.