rsbm
Thank you. Yes, I agree on a lot of what you said. However, I really think the second witness that told LE about seeing IY that night was DJiii. That’s the ONLY person in all this that has not been arrested & he drove IY to FL! Him talking is the only way I can make sense of him not being arrested. LE found out about AF thru recorded I mate phone calls. There’s an article posted somewhere in this thread. I do think that they found her remains thru AF talking IMO. Also IMO there’s a reason he stayed in jail when he was granted bond (snitches get stitches). I also think that AF arranged for DJiii to drive IY to FL (DJiii is AF’s brother-in-law) bc the warrant said “provided transportation” & when IY showed up, he told DJiii all that while AF was out disposing if evidence. That’s all IMO & kinda how I think about how it would have all gone down.
RBBM. IMO they were probably longer shorts with a waist band with belt loops & he maybe had a belt on? That’s how I’ve been thinking about it in my mind...
Being from here & growing up only an hour south of here, I can 100% see a scenario where she would have given him a ride if she didn’t get a bad vibe - plus the fact that bc this is considered a safe area...someone kidnapping me would never have come to mind before. I wouldn’t bc I trust no one lol Even if she was a little weirded out, the gas station choices that are close to that first one are not even 2 minutes away. Maybe she just thought I’ll just drive him it’s right there...who knows. But I could def see that happening. Also, I thought I remembered that the car was pinged in the turning lane to get on the interstate 85 on ramp...does anyone else remember that? I was mentioning it bc I feel like that would rule out the two gas stations on the other side of the interstate. Leaving pretty much two options **depending on the time stamp on footage** either the Walmart gas station or the one on Harmon.
Explain the second gas station then. Why doesnt she just drive away when IY steps out? If she's tied up then who caused the accident to the car?
What I’m thinking is it didn’t go south till right after that...that’s the only way I can make sense of her not driving off. That is IF that second gas station footage is right after 11:30. Any longer than that, IY could have had time to take her back to that hotel/pick up someone else, etc. but if the footage is right after 11:30 idk how it’s not her in the car.
No, you’re right, I can’t explain that. But there are other things I can’t explain either. For example, the snap texts.
None of the documentation indicate they were actually at the second gas station at all. The wreck could have happened within camera range of the second store for all we know.
Pure unadultrated speculation, but....: she drove. he shot her. she wrecked within camera range of a gas station. he got out, moved her over, got back in and drove. The vagueness of released information allows for countless possibilities.
If she gave him a ride willingly, then we have to discount the eye witness that said she was forced against her will. Secondly, there is no documentation indicating that they were actually "at" the second gas station, much less him going inside of it. But definitely the time between 11:20 and 12:30 is troubling. Not a lot of places to go unnoticed with a carjacking victim in that area. Every second on the road increases his risk.
No where does it say blood was found on the passenger seat. Even if it was, if fits the theory that he shoved her body over there so he could drive.
That statement was removed out of the second affidavit (the part about forcing her into the car). It uses the word “interacting” which I thought was weird. Just from the limited gas station options where they were, it’s hard for me to imagine that those gas stations pick up anything other than their parking lots. The Chevron on Harmon is the only one that I know for a fact has cameras. They definitely wouldn’t pick anything up across a street IMO.
It says “passenger compartment” which technically can mean any seat but if he shot her in the car, I’d be willing to bet that blood got on all the seats some kind of way...
We can agree on that for sure. I was being pedantic
. Technically, the blood could have simply been on clothing found in the console, for example.The "forcing" statement is still present in the murder while kidnapping warrant. It says "interacting" in the murder while in vehicle warrant. Not sure why they are different, but both are valid because both are required.
Exactly.
EXACTLY my thoughts too.
