Intermezzo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2008
- Messages
- 10,623
- Reaction score
- 1,677
The title of Earl, the one which he was fully entitled to, is the one I was referring to. The title of Prince isn't supposed to go down as far as the great-grandson of the monarch, so Archie wouldn't be entitled to that one. But Harry and Meghan didn't want him to be known by any title....same as Princess Anne's children didn't have a title, but there weren't titles like Earl available for them to which they would have been automatically entitled to use.
All I meant was that not only was Archie further down the hierarchy of those in line to the throne, his parents also chose to not give him any title. I just think these are more reasons why their decision to not do the hospital steps after the birth isn't really such an awful or disrespectful decision? Maybe Diana thought it would be a nice thing to do for the public when she gave birth to her children, who were closer to the succession of the throne? But was it really necessary for Meghan to do the same thing for Archie?
Just to add, Lets not forget about Prince Edward.
Prince Edward did not become a Duke upon his marriage as is the custom ( iirc he declined a dukedom) but chose to become an Earl instead
Prince Edward and his wife also chose not to bestow the title of Prince and Princess onto their children, titles they were entitled to as the male line grandchildren of a monarch and children of a Prince.
"on the day that the Earl and Countess of Wessex married, an announcement from Buckingham Palace said:
The Queen has also decided, with the agreement of The Prince Edward and Miss Rhys-Jones, that any children they might have should not be given the style His or Her Royal Highness, but would have courtesy titles as sons or daughters of an Earl."
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-Princ...-of-the-Monarch-and-children-of-a-Prince-also