SMK777
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 5,144
- Reaction score
- 43,524
I had thought of this aspect as well, but I’ve always understood that prior crimes can’t be brought up in a current case—Even if they’re strongly related (eg prior rape charges in a current rape case).I think the records request would be more for his current trial to show a pattern of behavior and criminal activity to use for prosecution, since it was requested by the prosecutor. I still think it's a positive sign that they haven't ruled him out yet though. This is such a high profile, high publicity crime and I'd expect them to have their ducks in a row. I understand the families have been waiting, but if they know it's him and he's already in jail, then I'd say it's worth waiting if it means a conviction and an end to a 4 year search. I still have a good feeling about this. Too many things just add up. He could end up being linked to more than just Delphi.
Additionally, the case involving the 9 year old is so extremely criminal in it’s known details, that these priors seem innocuous in comparison.
I do see your point, but I can’t help feeling that they’re also combing through his history with an eye to Delphi, and the DA’s office may be a part of this.
As the maxim goes: Time will tell..