keep-it-real
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Messages
- 1,738
- Reaction score
- 3,549
I believe cold case ruled out any connection of DB ‘s sighting of this large bag with the Claudia Lawrence case .
Did they confirm this with you directly PJ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe cold case ruled out any connection of DB ‘s sighting of this large bag with the Claudia Lawrence case .
It’s a police tactic - the team already have many of the pieces. Did the team position the appeal video screen strategically or was it an accident it was outside a suspects home? The bus cctv and the Astra van appeal - is purely showing the perps - give yourself up - we can see you. Alleyway man isn’t about alleyway man - it’s about white coat - the perps know they have been seen. They may be fooling some people but they’re not fooling the policeHave the police ever asked any questions about this car ? I always thought they wanted to know about the truck !?
In that case , the police are not fooling them … after nearly 13 years !It’s a police tactic - the team already have many of the pieces. Did the team position the appeal video screen strategically or was it an accident it was outside a suspects home? The bus cctv and the Astra van appeal - is purely showing the perps - give yourself up - we can see you. Alleyway man isn’t about alleyway man - it’s about white coat - the perps know they have been seen. They may be fooling some people but they’re not fooling the police
If the police know who it, why did they arrest the 4 and the others?It’s a police tactic - the team already have many of the pieces. Did the team position the appeal video screen strategically or was it an accident it was outside a suspects home? The bus cctv and the Astra van appeal - is purely showing the perps - give yourself up - we can see you. Alleyway man isn’t about alleyway man - it’s about white coat - the perps know they have been seen. They may be fooling some people but they’re not fooling the police
Although in my mind disappearance being on way to work on the 19th seems more realistic (personal opinion) I am very respectful of others who have clearly looked into and cared about this case for a long time and believe evening 18th . Ok so if we go with it being evening 18th around 8 30pm onwards and the white car relevant I just can't get my head around how she left home by force or voluntarily without being seen or heard. I appreciate you could say the same about 5am but far more people awake evenings even late. If left voluntarily most likely based on above thoughts presumably intended straight to work in the morning from new location by taking her rucksack with chefs whites in.
Any investigation - can be complex - the lawrance case - just look at the volume of evidence the team had to go through - over 2000 pieces of evidence - countless witness statements - fingers will be pointed and lines have to be investigated - though in the end the case rests in Heworth on the shoulders of people known to Claudia.If the police know who it, why did they arrest the 4 and the others?
She wasn’t seen anywhere on the 19th? Was she at home or was she in Heworth? If she went to work on the 19th - why did her phone remain close to her home some four hours after she failed to turn up work, why didn’t she text anyone after 8.23pm on the 18th - the “avid texter”? The mystery boyfriend maybe - though the 18thThe police beleive she was at home when she made the calls plus that she left usual time to go to work!
There is no need for us to doubt this .
The police want someone to come forward
They probably have but only with suspicions.
There is only one person in the whole world that knows where she is .
And IMO it’s the mystery boyfriend.
The police beleive she was at home when she made the calls plus that she left usual time to go to work!
There is no need for us to doubt this .
The police want someone to come forward
They probably have but only with suspicions.
There is only one person in the whole world that knows where she is .
And IMO it’s the mystery boyfriend.
You say … with respect … that she was not seen on the 19 thShe wasn’t seen anywhere on the 19th? Was she at home or was she in Heworth? If she went to work on the 19th - why did her phone remain close to her home some four hours after she failed to turn up work, why didn’t she text anyone after 8.23pm on the 18th - the “avid texter”? The mystery boyfriend maybe - though the 18th
I guess around March 18th in York sunset would be about 6pm. Claudia lived in a terraced house on a busy main road with a thriving pub yards away. Neighbours were probably used to commotion outside their doors. Unless you had a curtain twitcher people who have been working or have children are too busy in an evening to care what's going on. She could have nipped out the back door or equally left by the front door with a trusted acquaintance. No need to holler or yell for help. All IMOAlthough in my mind disappearance being on way to work on the 19th seems more realistic (personal opinion) I am very respectful of others who have clearly looked into and cared about this case for a long time and believe evening 18th . Ok so if we go with it being evening 18th around 8 30pm onwards and the white car relevant I just can't get my head around how she left home by force or voluntarily without being seen or heard. I appreciate you could say the same about 5am but far more people awake evenings even late. If left voluntarily most likely based on above thoughts presumably intended straight to work in the morning from new location by taking her rucksack with chefs whites in.
Or there were no people.You say … with respect … that she was not seen on the 19 th
The police believe she was seen by two different people and they ( police ) believed the witnesses !
And since no one has come forward saying it was them ( couple ) it would be logical to assume he was the perpetrator and the woman was the victim !
You say … with respect … that she was not seen on the 19 th
The police believe she was seen by two different people and they ( police ) believed the witnesses !
And since no one has come forward saying it was them ( couple ) it would be logical to assume he was the perpetrator and the woman was the victim !
I guess around March 18th in York sunset would be about 6pm. Claudia lived in a terraced house on a busy main road with a thriving pub yards away. Neighbours were probably used to commotion outside their doors. Unless you had a curtain twitcher people who have been working or have children are too busy in an evening to care what's going on. She could have nipped out the back door or equally left by the front door with a trusted acquaintance. No need to holler or yell for help. All IMO
It’s a police tactic - the team already have many of the pieces. Did the team position the appeal video screen strategically or was it an accident it was outside a suspects home? The bus cctv and the Astra van appeal - is purely showing the perps - give yourself up - we can see you. Alleyway man isn’t about alleyway man - it’s about white coat - the perps know they have been seen. They may be fooling some people but they’re not fooling the police
Agreed but the police put it out there and even after nearly 13 years no one has come forward confirming it was them and not Claudia and the perpetrator…so it’s logical to assume it was Claudia.I’m going to leave it at that IMOPJ with repect this is not the case the male and female on the bridge and the couple arguing on University road have not been identified and it was pointed out by Galloway that NYP do not know that the female in each case was Claudia
skip video to 12.17