I thought that in the first redacted copy of the RL doc they forgot to redact one instance of that name and that it was Adam? I’m sorry I have no link for that. I tried to look for it but couldn’t find. Anyone else remember this?
Thanks! That is what I did!
It wasn't in the RL doc., it was in KAK's. The MS version, pg 68
www.docdroid.net
Now THAT is good to know! I had not heard that. And Adam is also a 4 letter name. lol Back to being serious... if that's the case, why did RL feel the need for an alibi between 2-2:30 which was when things went down? If it was Adam RL asked his cousin to tell LE had picked him up... it would have been making an alibi for just himself, and not potentially trying to make one for RMA.
It wasn't in the RL doc., it was in KAK's. The MS version, pg 68
Murder Sheet Kegan Kline Redacted Statement.pdf
e Th. he rS de. ur M. et. e Th. he rS de. ur M. et. e Th. he rS de. ur M. et. ...
Appears it was KAK's and not RL's doc that I was talking about. Thanks, @FrostedGlass for clearing that up.
Yes, that's exactly my interpretation of that. It does get a little confusing though, doesn't it? lol Sometimes I feel like it would be easier to stand in front of a presentation on a large screen with a pointer as I try to explain some of my points. lol
I might just be a snot but what does RA's wife being "a wonderful person" and "they've been married thirty years..." have to do with anything that this case is about? He has been arrested for two counts of murder, right? I know I should probably read more, yada yada, but how pertinent is all this stuff about his marriage, etc.? ETA, where is there proof that anyone thinks there IS an accomplice? I've only seen that someone considers this a possibility. It's possible that a purple people eater was involved too, yes?
It's a well known fact that purple people eaters do not exist. They went extinct ~100,000 years ago after they ate the last purple person. I mean, when was the last time YOU saw a purple person, or a purple people eater for that matter? I rest my case.
| Diet:*advertiser censored* sapiens purpureus volans unicornatus. Extinct due to non-existence of prey species. Other salient characteristics: has one eye. |
Again, they were open to one or more people being involved. I'm paraphrasing because I don't know how to do anything else. Being open to it doesn't mean that they think it is the case.
Good point lol
THanks for sharing this!
I think they're leaning in on the innocent until proven guilty angle. So basically, sympathy. The lawyer was answering a question about how this has impacted RA's family, so then he goes on to speak about his wife, high school sweethearts, blah blah.
That makes sense. It is just that the interview of RA's atty was so well attended by the media and this raised my hackles. moo
I never had RL on my list of poi (if I remember well
IF the property owner RL and RA had indeed a connection, then I believe, they were known to one another through their "hobby" drinking at a pub. Whoever likes to do it, always knows a lot of men, who also like to do it (drinking). MOO
I would have never thought of that LOL
In my opinion, what I got from that comment was that a man married to his high school sweetheart for 30+ years is indicative of stability and decent character--not expected of a murderer of two children. I am beginning to feel the possibility that Allen is being railroaded. His bail hearing is set for February--nearly 3 months from now! If he is guilty, why all the secrecy and why the desire to hold him in prison for 3 months before having a bail hearing? What happened to having the right to a speedy trial? It seems as time goes on, the government more and more does what it wants, no matter what the rules are, no matter what the law and the constitution says. My opinion only.
