IMO It's irresponsible & unfair to pick apart literally everything a person says or does because they are accused of a crime.
The defendent has a right to defend themselves.
Why not allow the entire process and full story to be told?
In this particular case the defense is saying they look forward to telling their side. It's at the point where they do, when people can make an informative decision on guilt or innocence.
The process is the same whether it's someone accused of speeding or accused of murder.
This is a totally viable individual choice. But Websleuths is here for a reason. Discussing crime is an age-old human activity, from which we learn.
If you prefer to wait until trial (if there is one) to discuss it in depth, these threads are probably going to make you perennially uncomfortable.
I can't help but react to certain crimes, it's in my nature and part of my identity/profession. It's the same for many WSers.
We have a series of lawyers here, some of them criminal defense attorneys. We have former and current LEO's, psychologists, physicians, social workers, journalists, corrections officers. We also have a very large number of crime victims, many of whom have some form of C-PTSD or similar and for whom it's quite helpful to revisit the crime topic with an eye to trying to understand something that none of us are likely to ever understand fully.
We point telescopes into space to try and understand what's out there, because we are curious.
Same thing with inspecting crime. In this case, the criminal defendant has made a lot of interesting errors and left a trail that's got a lot to talk over. For me, this is like my old neighborhood (where the guy across the street was a cop, and there were various crimes that occurred and my parents and everyone else would gather to discuss details, sometimes for a long time and over many months). It's important to satisfy our human curiosity, and nothing wrong with being curious about crime and the criminal mind.
BTW, if you wait until trial to try and catch up on the in's and out's of a particular case, you're cutting yourself off from a lot of nuance and a thorough understanding of how the legal system works. My time here on WS has taught me so much about criminal procedure - I regard some of our posters here as true experts on the topic and since I'm not at all an expert in that field, it's a daily education for me.
The defense will tell its side. And, I might add, that some people who've been arrested for serious crimes are actually shouting from the rooftops at every chance they or counsel get that they are innocent. We may yet see that from BK, but his utterances reported at the time of his arrest were not of that sort. Wasn't the first thing on his mind (to assert innocence) but to ask if anyone else had been arrested (worried about Dad, I expect).