Missyrocks5
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2022
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 3,009
Thank goodness one of those ridiculous rewriting of facts documentaries didn’t persuade that justice be overturned. Vile man who should rot in jail.
His mouthy, deluded sister gets on my one last nerve.Well today…
If you search Scott Peterson - the word “denied” is there
If you search “denied” - the name Scott Peterson is there
“Denied“- to refuse to accept the
existence, truth, or validity
IMO
That man needs to shut it & serve his punishment
He and his family refuse to accept two basic facts: 1) The "sightings" of Laci walking her dog were false- it was determined to be another pregnant woman wearing black and white, 2) Richelle Nice aka Strawberry Shortcake wasn't a stealth juror. She reached her decision fairly that Scott was guilty, and Geragos could have had her striken from the jury in jury selection, but he chose not to.Well today…
If you search Scott Peterson - the word “denied” is there
If you search “denied” - the name Scott Peterson is there
“Denied“- to refuse to accept the
existence, truth, or validity
IMO
That man needs to shut it & serve his punishment
Will Scott be back home at San Quentin in time for the holidays? Just in time to get his slice of barely FDA approved turkey?
Very happy to see this put to rest.
moo
Guess he lost his historic Bay view. He's way inland now.Per my notes - he is no longer in San Quentin. After his death penalty was lifted & sentenced to life in prison - he got moved.
Peterson was transferred from San Quentin State Prison (~10/21/22) to Mule Creek State Prison.
Guess he lost his historic Bay view. He's way inland now.
Peterson last month filed a new petition for habeas corpus in California’s First District Court of Appeal. It has six claims, including that new witnesses have come forward with information supporting the defense’s theory that Laci was abducted and killed by men she saw burglarizing a neighbor’s home.Scott Peterson isn’t giving up on getting a new trial. Here’s who he says killed Laci
“New evidence is of such decisive force and value that it would be more likely than not to change the outcome at trial,” the petition reads.news.yahoo.com
That's not new! Those were proven false sightings.He's still not done.
Peterson last month filed a new petition for habeas corpus in California’s First District Court of Appeal. It has six claims, including that new witnesses have come forward with information supporting the defense’s theory that Laci was abducted and killed by men she saw burglarizing a neighbor’s home.
I don't have the time right now to listen and watch the entire video but I am familiar with the arguments against Scott Petersen's guilt. I believe the police thoroughly investigated the burglary issue from the house across the street. I have always said this: if Mark Geragos had witnesses that could support his case regarding the burglary across the street, why didn't he put those people on the stand? As far as Laci sightings, eye witness testimony is so unreliable. I recall when Caylee Anthony was said to be missing, there were many alleged sightings of her all over the place and we know where she was- lying dead.
According to video all so-called witnesses. (Walking dog witnesses) said she had black pants, white topper. But her body was found in cream or khaki colored pants. Doesn't prove someone didn't change her pants, but why? If she had been abducted and dog found, where was time/opp to change her clothes? Video is vg at tracing things he said to af, and things he did like tracing currents in bay weeks ahead.I don't have the time right now to listen and watch the entire video but I am familiar with the arguments against Scott Petersen's guilt. I believe the police thoroughly investigated the burglary issue from the house across the street. I have always said this: if Mark Geragos had witnesses that could support his case regarding the burglary across the street, why didn't he put those people on the stand? As far as Laci sightings, eye witness testimony is so unreliable. I recall when Caylee Anthony was said to be missing, there were many alleged sightings of her all over the place and we know where she was- lying dead.
And IIRC, the pregnant woman that the initial witnesses claimed they saw walking a dog was actually determined to be a pregnant neighbour who also had a dog. It was not Lacey.I don't have the time right now to listen and watch the entire video but I am familiar with the arguments against Scott Petersen's guilt. I believe the police thoroughly investigated the burglary issue from the house across the street. I have always said this: if Mark Geragos had witnesses that could support his case regarding the burglary across the street, why didn't he put those people on the stand? As far as Laci sightings, eye witness testimony is so unreliable. I recall when Caylee Anthony was said to be missing, there were many alleged sightings of her all over the place and we know where she was- lying dead.
you make excellent pointsAnd IIRC, the pregnant woman that the initial witnesses claimed they saw walking a dog was actually determined to be a pregnant neighbour who also had a dog. It was not Lacey.
Lacey was very pregnant and home alone that day. If she did happen upon 3 burglars , I highly doubt she would have confronted them and threatened to call the cops. She grew up in Modesto--- she was street smart and knew better. That story makes no sense. Any rational pregnant woman would have pretended she saw nothing and escaped the situation before calling 911. IMO
I drove by San Quentin again on Christmas Eve, and made sure to flip him off as we drove by.