Search results for query: *

If I recall correctly, The prosecution suggested she went FORWARD like 34-36? Feet then went in reverse 50+ ft plus the 34-36ft for a total reverse of around 84+ ft. All in the 10 second window and no idea if further after. Couldn't have happened. IMO.

Dr. Scordi‑Bello stated clearly under oath: No physical evidence on O’Keefe’s body definitively showed he was struck by a vehicle. The injuries observed could just as plausibly be the result of a fall or other blunt trauma, not necessarily a car collision. Her testimony cast significant...

DBM

IMO that is the whole issue

If she had clarified the verdict slip, we would have had a verdict hours ago.

My Law and Crime shows 14 hours 42 minutes

Same Issue as Trial One -- WTH - Bev could have cleared that up with better verdict slips

I could swear she agreed to it and then did not say it!

Jury has a question!

Hos long to Verdict!!!!!!

on video

I'm really confused as I thought the 3 point turn was not on Fairview but on Cedarcrest prior to arrival at 34 Fairview and ONLY used to track time and event. Am I wrong?

That needs to be repeated.

Trust me that's the CORRECT DIAGNOSIS lol

I know this person well. I was married to one. Lol. Was the operative word.

Whoa Nelly Edited to Add that I apologize as I am way behind and my post probably don't line up with what you all are watching.

OMG - He is just out there in his questions. Dr. is just appalled, it appears. But Bev - I'm going to allow it lol.

so confused why another sidebah when I didn't even hear Brennan object or ask for one - what is wrong with him opining on the sweatshirt holes?

And, Immediately, Sidebah

WITH PREJUDICE!!!