arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
Have you seen Max's back? It looked horrible. Was Max planking, attempting to swing on the chandelier, slide down the banister? Thank you for your vote.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't see his back not sure I want to. My little guys are Max's age
I do think that Max was riding the scooter in the upstairs hallway and managed to collide with banister just where it dips going down the first stair.
I had proposed this early on.
I did not know about the paint transfer from the railing base in the stairwell to the scooter until the recent Dr. Phil show, which adds support to the scooter being involved in the accident.
If Max was riding the scooter in the same direction as the proposed scenario given by LE and abruptly hit the dip in the banister, the bar connected to the scooter and the handle bar would act as pivot and launch both him and the scooter over the railing, into the chandelier and as Time said, if he landed on the scooter it could account for marks on his back.
I do think that Max was riding the scooter in the upstairs hallway and managed to collide with banister just where it dips going down the first stair.
I had proposed this early on.
I did not know about the paint transfer from the railing base in the stairwell to the scooter until the recent Dr. Phil show, which adds support to the scooter being involved in the accident.
If Max was riding the scooter in the same direction as the proposed scenario given by LE and abruptly hit the dip in the banister, the bar connected to the scooter and the handle bar would act as pivot and launch both him and the scooter over the railing, into the chandelier and as Time said, if he landed on the scooter it could account for marks on his back.
I apologize for the duplicate post. I think I finally figured out what I am doing wrong. I think it happens when I back out using the arrow at the top left screen. How does everyone else get to the next page? Do you have to use the arrows on the bottom of the page that push you to the next thread?
While I am here and asking questions, can anyone tell me what the letters "msm" abbreviate? Tia.
I apologize for the duplicate post. I think I finally figured out what I am doing wrong. I think it happens when I back out using the arrow at the top left screen. How does everyone else get to the next page? Do you have to use the arrows on the bottom of the page that push you to the next thread?
While I am here and asking questions, can anyone tell me what the letters "msm" abbreviate? Tia.
What an absolutely brilliant theory. You have excellent thinking.
Your theory is the first that I have read that fits like a hand in a glove. All the pieces make sense. If he was riding and hit the dip in the rail, then that would have jettisoned him over and into the chandelier. Falling on the scooter makes total sense. There was a story somewhere and I wish I could remember where that alleged Max was found on his stomach when first the responders arrived.
Rebecca could not remember whether she turned Max over or not but if he landed on his back and on top of the scooter then maybe she did. Maybe in her hysteria she tried to start CPR and rescue breathing and realized he was on top of the scooter and turned him over to get him off of it.
The other version of how Max was found stated that he was on his back when found with the scooter laying across his shin. If Rebecca was tryng to re-position Max off off the scooter that could account for how it ended up on his shin.
Your theory gives me hope that the pieces of this puzzle may actually come together into to some logical order soon. This was a truly horrible accident.
I now know how I'm going to vote on the poll. Thank you for posting!
It seems that everything besides resuscitating Max and getting him prompt medical attention would have faded into the background the moment she found him. She probably experienced tunnel vision and was hyper focused on reviving him and getting her sister to contact 911. Whatever she needed to do in order to accomplish this: move items, position him correctly for CPR, she did without even thinking about it, I agree.
As the theory advances the pieces of this puzzle will fall in place. We still have a long way to go because Rebecca is deceased and can't say what happened. Her sister may be able to help but since she is a minor she is rightfully under the protective custody of her guardians.
I'm not sure under what circumstances we can ever know what Rebecca's youngest sister would have to say on this matter unless Mary or Snowem release that information to the public. If that does happen it will not be for a long while and after the disposition of Rebecca's case is settled.
It is also possible if the Zahau family do not get criminal justice that they may go after Jonah in a civil suit. If they settle out of court Jonah may attach a no talk stipulation to the agreement like he did with Dina's settlement so we may never know what Rebecca's younger sister saw and knew about that morning.
Only time will tell. However, I do think that it is good to keep interest alive in this case because LE did a shoddy and unscrupulous investigation that should not be forgotten especially at election time.
BBM
I wonder if the Zahau family have grounds to take Dina Romano to court?
As the theory advances the pieces of this puzzle will fall in place. We still have a long way to go because Rebecca is deceased and can't say what happened. Her sister may be able to help but since she is a minor she is rightfully under the protective custody of her guardians.
I'm not sure under what circumstances we can ever know what Rebecca's youngest sister would have to say on this matter unless Mary or Snowem release that information to the public. If that does happen it will not be for a long while and after the disposition of Rebecca's case is settled.
It is also possible if the Zahau family do not get criminal justice that they may go after Jonah in a civil suit. If they settle out of court Jonah may attach a no talk stipulation to the agreement like he did with Dina's settlement so we may never know what Rebecca's younger sister saw and knew about that morning.
Only time will tell. However, I do think that it is good to keep interest alive in this case because LE did a shoddy and unscrupulous investigation that should not be forgotten especially at election time.
BBM
I wonder if the Zahau family have grounds to take Dina Romano to court?
I think a court case is going to be the only way the public will learn why DS didn't want her child left alone with RZ.
JMO