Have you ever by accident aspirated water while awake, say while swimming. Remember how you felt.
Then "someone" wants me to believe that a person who is healthy, can then fall asleep breathing air and then "breathe" water and NOT wake up.
Beyond common sense.....BTW, just because there is no "obvious" motive to "laypersons" does not mean that Ryan has his own motive in his own mind. A person can speculate, but only Ryan knows his "true" motives.
Could be any reason.....remember Ryan went to great lengths to ensure that everyone "thought" it was natural...........
BBM-
ITA!
If it's true that he was surfing adult sites (the family deny this and claim that they have IT pros who can prove they were just pop-ups), then there is the possibility that his wife was not pro *advertiser censored*, and they argued about it, leading to a sudden violent outburst.
Although many men and women are pro *advertiser censored* and like to indulge- not everyone is. Just google *advertiser censored* addiction and you will see what I mean. Apparently its one of the leading causes of divorce now. And most of the wives live in shame and secrecy, not sharing their pain with even their closest loved ones becuase they will likely be told "boys will be boys- what's the big deal?". Or because they dont want to admit that their 'perfect' husband is so weak that he cannot resist giving into temptation.
And IIRC there has been a case where the husband murdered his wife because he didnt want his secret addiction revealed.
Back to this case: Apparently the prosecution could not present this evidence at trial because the files had been deleted and they couldn't prove that his wife had seen them. But then I have to ask why they were deleted at all?
Most *advertiser censored* addicts cover their tracks by deleting the files. Why delete something if it was just a pop-up?
Having said that, I don't believe there was enough evidence to support a guilty verdict at the first trial.
Also it has come out that when the autopsy was performed, they did not complete all possible testing for rare diseases because of the huge cost involved. His supporters are outraged at this, but then why didnt thier own expert perform these tests?
The only thing worse than an innocent man sitting behind bars is a guilty man walking free.
It will be interesting to see what comes out at the new trial.
JMO.
ETA: just wanted to add that I still have no idea of this mans guilt or innocence. There is very little evidence, but my 'hinky meter' went off as soon as I read the 911 transcript. On a different thread another WS'er posted the following link about 911 calls and how they are assessed for clues as to the callers guilt or innocence.
http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2008/june2008/june2008leb.htm