When I saw the groin shot in Taylor's autopsy report I became 99.9% convinced a young immature male was involved. I also think he knew Taylor and she knew him. So along that line I think this was probably an escalation of a previous conflict.
But if you think about this it doesn't make sense.
Let's say the person who made the groin shot was a young male who knew Taylor. This means he is a local. The other guy is someone he runs around with and so is probably close in age. He is probably a local also unless he was visiting this kid, which I doubt. There could be a third person.
Local people should be able to give LE a short list of young men who they think are capable of something like this.
If this was an escalation of a previous conflict I find it hard to believe other people, especially kids in the area, don't know about the previous conflict.
These guys were probably tooling around in their vehicle that Sunday which means somebody should have seen them driving around. This in my opinion is the biggest red flag in this case. I do not think these guys got in the vehicle with the intent of killing these girls. I think they were driving around, doing whatever, they happened upon the girls, something happened and the girls were killed. So how in the H does somebody not give LE a name of a kid driving around that Sunday. LE should have been on this within hours.
So if this crime happened this way, how was it not solved within hours?
If this crime was done by young locals then there is no way it should be unsolved. Something is wrong. It either didn't happen that way or the investigation was compromised.
But if you think about this it doesn't make sense.
Let's say the person who made the groin shot was a young male who knew Taylor. This means he is a local. The other guy is someone he runs around with and so is probably close in age. He is probably a local also unless he was visiting this kid, which I doubt. There could be a third person.
Local people should be able to give LE a short list of young men who they think are capable of something like this.
If this was an escalation of a previous conflict I find it hard to believe other people, especially kids in the area, don't know about the previous conflict.
These guys were probably tooling around in their vehicle that Sunday which means somebody should have seen them driving around. This in my opinion is the biggest red flag in this case. I do not think these guys got in the vehicle with the intent of killing these girls. I think they were driving around, doing whatever, they happened upon the girls, something happened and the girls were killed. So how in the H does somebody not give LE a name of a kid driving around that Sunday. LE should have been on this within hours.
So if this crime happened this way, how was it not solved within hours?
If this crime was done by young locals then there is no way it should be unsolved. Something is wrong. It either didn't happen that way or the investigation was compromised.