11/17/11 4:30pm - a critical time in our case. *This time has many implications!
1. Attorney MN *said a witness can verify that "by" 4:30 p.m. that same day, Smith arrived at his parents' house with the kids in tow. He indicates it's an impossible timeline for murder. * Make note of the word "by"
http://www.wesh.com/news/29958175/detail.html#ixzz1kjQVKWRS
This means Dale was at Rose Blvd sometime before 4:30pm. Attorneys are known for their craft of the human language. They often use intentional language that allows them to say one thing which very subtlety means another. From Mn's statement do we really know what time Dale arrived? Notice he didn't say Dale "arrived at" 4:30pm or "shortly before" or "shortly after". Instead he says "by" 4:30pm.
2. *YS said, "We know for a fact, today, that Hoffner is a place that her cell-phone was on at about 4:30 in the afternoon on November 17th,"*
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/new...parker-from-day-she-disappeared#ixzz1kjU3pAXT
According to Google Maps
Hoffner *is about 3.5+ miles from Dale's condo on Goldenrod and about 6+ miles from Dale Sr's home on Rose Blvd. *It would probably take at least 10-15 minutes to get from Hoffner to Rose so if YS is correct there is no way for DS to get to Rose "by" 4:30 if DS and Michelle's phone are still at Hoffner "about 4:30"...
Unless:
A. more than 1 person was involved (one has phone and/or Michelle) and dale is taking kids to parent's between 4 and 4:30 as he says he did.
B. Dale arrived much earlier than 4:30. This is where attorney MN's word "by" could be crucial. If Dale arrived at rose at say 4pm which is still "by"4:30pm, he has time to drop kids off and still be by Hoffner when ping occurs "around 4:30pm"...
What does 4:30pm really tell us? Your thoughts...