For the first time, I noticed that (IMVHO) her pupils are somewhat constricted in this pic. Was this a pic that she used to advertise her services? Pinpoint pupils can be a sign of opiate use. Although, if I remember correctly, MBB wasn't reported to have used drugs, which doesn't necessarily mean she didn't. Maybe he is looking for signs of drug use in his victims?
http://theemtspot.com/2009/04/23/rapid-diagnosis-pinpoint-pupils/
That was months ago and my answer is in post #1198. Maureen doesn't strike me as a young woman with drug issues.
One day my sister in law was going to visit us. She called my wife for some gossip when she's on the bus, just a few hundred yards away from our home, then she got off the bus still talking on the phone with my wife she fell and guess what she did? She reported the falling in no second. Why? Because that's what sisters do. They normally share. Maureen is robbed and supposedly managed to take her money back. That is an adventure but she doesn't even say a word about it to her sister? Why? I'm thinking of a possibility that she was assaulted inside the hotel room and let go on the promise of keeping shut, i.e. threatened. Then they changed their mind, found her back.
I'm more intrigued in the mother and the toddler. I believe LISK knows the mother, that's why he didn't bother to take the bracelets that look like gold but not gold.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...t-your-Theory-Profile&p=10927735#post10927735
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...t-your-Theory-Profile&p=10930880#post10930880
I believe mother died first then the toddler. Because a baby of 18-32 months has a very special ability, she can speak. That's why the poor baby died.
Since I theorize that it's the same killing crew from Fire Island Lady (1996) to Amber Costello (2010), it's interesting why the mother is dismembered. That may be another indicator that the mother knew the killer(s). That is, if the mother is identified that can lead LE to the killer(s). And I believe these bracelets are on the market in 2009/2010 and there's a possibility that they are sold exclusively online. Something that looks like gold but is not gold will be lightweight. So, selling them online , i.e. eliminating the chance of the potential customer to feel them, would be a good marketing strategy. Groupon sells those bracelets. Walmart also sells a very similar model, not the exact model. On the off chance that they are bought online, there's nothing that keeps Law Enforcement from identifying the victim. All they need to do is to check the account that purchased both items. I wrote an email to SCPD, notified them about the possibility. I didn't even get an automated reply.
I believe that is the same band who killed Eve Eskin Brown, Thalia Stathis, Tanya Rush, Andre Jamal Isaac, and Rashawn Brazzel and two other victims dismembered in Brooklyn. I am suggesting that the Asian Male on Gilgo Beach is Tirrel Santiago.
Tirrel is not Asian, he is Black/Hispanic, I think the forensic anthropologist was baffled with his skull and picked Asian. That's it. Law Enforcement can check the DNA of the Asian Male to see which racial characteristics are present, or more simply they can just put a DNA sample from Tirrel Santiago or his family members. I have no doubt in my mind that Tirrel Santiago is the Asian Male. Both NYPD and SCPD and Namus are notified about the possibility. I am aware that what I'm saying implies somebody made a mistake in the process. It may be hard for people to admit that. But let's assume I'm the one who is mistaken, what keeps Law Enforcement from putting a DNA sample for Tirrel? Nothing.
What happens if Tirrel is the Asian Male?
I believe it proves two things,
1) White serial killers do not usually cross the racial borders. Black killers sometimes do.
2) Young black gay men are killed, that may connect Santiago and Brazzel cases even stronger. In the latter, there is an identified "secret lover".
In Thalia Stathis case, the most important piece of evidence the prosecution has is a blood stain that does not generate a strict match with the victim. How is that possible? That is
impossible. The litigation is questionable from start to end. A man is accused of murder but not allowed to speak? What kind of trial is that?
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...t-your-Theory-Profile&p=10954591#post10954591
Long in short, I believe all it takes for bringing LISK to justice is sweat, but nobody seems willing to work. We can continue thinking that LISK is an intelligent, smart, cunning solo guy and that's why he is not caught, or we can admit that LE is doing nothing.