Searchfortruth
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,971
- Reaction score
- 8
I guess I don't understand, since Casey chose not to have a public defense lawyer, why would the state have to pay for her defense ?
What is he saying? Money is more important than justice? ! That statement is actually saying that Caylee is not worth it. Grrr...:banghead:I agree it was jose's idea to throw that out there
So what,,,, they do it all the time kc isn't the first maybe first for him though. Changes his status regardless of what he says.
I think if deemed she's indigent and the state has to pay for her defense, she can continue with Jose and whoever she has already chose to defend her, they just have to agree to work for whatever the state based "defense fee" is.
Whatever the public defenders office would pay a public defender to do the same job.
Only for some of the experts. She needs money to pay experts as well as her lawyers. The rates are very low. She also doesn't get every expert she wants but would have to make an application and justify each and every one as necessary to her defense.I guess I don't understand, since Casey chose not to have a public defense lawyer, why would the state have to pay for her defense ?
I guess I don't understand, since Casey chose not to have a public defense lawyer, why would the state have to pay for her defense ?
That might seem logical but it isn't the way it works. If she is found to be indigent and cannot pay an attorney and JB is not willing to work the case pro bono, and if she still wants an attorney he may be allowed to withdraw and the court will order the appointment of the public defender. She doesn't get to have a private attorney paid at public defender salary level paid for by the government. Not done. The Judiciary has some budget to pay for experts for an indigent defendant but their set rates are very low. It is like trying to find a doctor who will agree to provide services for medicare rates alone without supplemental billing.
As we all are. Some experts have claimed "pro-bono" others have said it's nobody's business or "no comment".
With the state paying for her defense, experts must agree to work for a "set price". Which is not much in compared to what they normally get paid.
If she can show the state that she is now "indigent", the state has to legally pay for a defense for her.
That public-paid defense is paid very little compared to what a private paid defense is.
I think this is why Baez is whining! It makes perfect sense. A death penalty case is going to cost a TON more money to defend. The funds coming in for her defense must NOT be unlimited. He is afraid they are going to run out of money or that he is going to have to PAY for her defense from HIS cut of the money.
Depends on whether or not there is a contract or whether it is an "as you go" situation. There may be some professional ethics rules that govern withdrawal if there has been an appearance on the record.So my question would be this. The one's that claimed were working pro-bono which are all except Baez would have to continue to work pro-bono? They can't just say they want to get paid now can they? :waitasec:
Okay, so Jose would have to work pro bono. (I knew about the state paid experts having to be pre-approved and working for a small set rate.)
I think this is exactly why he is whining.
She can claim indigency and ask for a public defender at almost any time.I guess I don't understand, since Casey chose not to have a public defense lawyer, why would the state have to pay for her defense ?
They would appoint the Public Defender's Office in Orange County, Florida. See his qualifications I posted above. The Public Defender is death penalty qualified.If they declare KC "indigent", the way I understand it is the State would have to foot her defense, but that does not mean with the "dream team" she has now. Doesn't it mean that they would discharge JB and his team and appoint a qualified attorney to take over?
That might seem logical but it isn't the way it works. If she is found to be indigent and cannot pay an attorney and JB is not willing to work the case pro bono, and if she still wants an attorney he may be allowed to withdraw and the court will order the appointment of the public defender. She doesn't get to have a private attorney paid at public defender salary level paid for by the government. Not done. The Judiciary has some budget to pay for experts for an indigent defendant but their set rates are very low. It is like trying to find a doctor who will agree to provide services for medicare rates alone without supplemental billing.
I have not read the entire thread and I admit I did a whoop of joy at first death penalty on the table BUT thinking about it I think it would be worse punishment spending each and every day the rest of your life in jail. Knowing that everyone's lives were moving on and you were never getting out. Being put to sleep never to wake up vs spending life behind bars I think jail is worse
That might seem logical but it isn't the way it works. If she is found to be indigent and cannot pay an attorney and JB is not willing to work the case pro bono, and if she still wants an attorney he may be allowed to withdraw and the court will order the appointment of the public defender. She doesn't get to have a private attorney paid at public defender salary level paid for by the government. Not done. The Judiciary has some budget to pay for experts for an indigent defendant but their set rates are very low. It is like trying to find a doctor who will agree to provide services for medicare rates alone without supplemental billing.
I have not read the entire thread and I admit I did a whoop of joy at first death penalty on the table BUT thinking about it I think it would be worse punishment spending each and every day the rest of your life in jail. Knowing that everyone's lives were moving on and you were never getting out. Being put to sleep never to wake up vs spending life behind bars I think jail is worse
I am sure they can chose to step out as long as they are replaced by the state.So my question would be this. The one's that claimed were working pro-bono which are all except Baez would have to continue to work pro-bono? They can't just say they want to get paid now can they? :waitasec: