I think Art Harris tried to be clear on this one, but he should've done a better job of following through. He should take a stance & stick to it. He comes across as one way on Levi's show & then another on the Nancy Grace show. I think Nancy has another source that tells her things & she 'pursuades' guests to agree with it. He should be ethical enough to stand his ground. I don't know who their sources are, & who knows...they may be right, but I don't care. I'm not accepting their inside info anymore. Actually, it's been awhile sice I have heard anything in this case that I didn't take with a grain of salt. For every story, there is a counter story, & that's the one thing we CAN depend on..
Respectfully Quoted dodie
BBM
Exactly. It is true of this case and it happens with news stories(even benign news, not necessarily crime news) I have looked into since I have been online. It's not easy to know what is true/factual. What
is great about the internet, is all the information is out there to be sleuthed. It
has to be sleuthed because as dodie has said, "for every story, there is a counter story..."
These "discrepancies" matter. It is a matter of ethics, a deep sense of what you have to say can effect important matters. You either have people debating over you while you seem to create controversy, or are above reproach. Growing up I was taught that most adults were above reproach, but I found out for myself it is the opposite. If the "adult" world lived half of the morals and ethics they teach children our would would be a much better place. IMHO. It is because children grow up watching adults do one thing while they say another. I remember my parents answer to this type of hypocritical behavior with, "do as we say and not as we do."
AH, NG, etc. all of these examples: they are not following even the basics of how to be a good citizen that we all learn in kindergarten. How about "don't lie" for one? A lie is a lie is a lie is a lie. For ratings, for careers, whatever the adult justification for breaking the most simple rule for living ever:
"Do unto others..." This is also about
credibility. Websleuthers have more credibility to me than major news sources. There are Websleuthers that have yet to lead me wrong. They have proven again and again, to have factual, credible information.
I said this in a post on another thread in this case, Websleuths is a place of truth because all information is looked at for its source. I love it, I love websleuths.
What we need is a central location for all the different stories coming in, so that all information can be taken into account, and then confirmed for accuracy...oh, wait that would be Websleuths. :blowkiss:
P.S. Imagine, at this point, reading what one article had to say about a story and taking that as the one and only absolute truth about the case.
You would not come near in having enough information to even begin to have an informed opinion. And, each news source wants and expects that you make them "Your ONLY source for news!" :rotfl:
:twocents: