darnudes
Inactive
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,551
- Reaction score
- -50
I have had to miss most of the last two days due to RL (which is much less interesting in many ways than my time here at WS but whaddaya gonna do?). I'm tempted to say "OK, so fill me in!" but I suspect there would be much rotten fruit flung in my direction if I did. :innocent:
I will say that I'm not worried about the juror who "can't judge" because IMO she will look to other jurors for input etc. I don't think she would be unable to vote ICA guilty. Do have concerns that she would just never open her mind to considering the DP however.
(And wow I've missed you guys SO MUCH! Thanks to everyone who posted so helpfully--it makes it so much easier to catch up. :blowkiss![]()
I'm with you!
I think juror 1319 is going to shock everyone - I've got a tingling in my fingers that tell me the defense wanted her off but the State jumped the gun and blew it.
When the juror said she didn't like to judge anyone (keeping in mind her faith and belief system - "judge not others lest you be judged") her answer was to be expected. Judge Perry has told the jurors they must tell the truth which is exactly what this lady did. In her personal life outside the courtroom she does not judge her fellow man on the opinions and words of others - quite right too for a practicing Christian one would think.
However, inside the courtroom is not the same thing and I too don't think it would be a problem for other jurors to explain the evidence to her and help her along so to speak. I think she is going to turn out to be one hell of a juror and the defense messed this up big time. Sucks to be them