2011.05.16 Jury Selection DAY SEVEN (Morning Edition)

[Moe]

Morning Peeps, I think we are in for another long day.

 

[jmfstl]

Baez objects to the objection. I thought it a right of the SA or DT to object?

 

[Rallihanna]

How can you object to an objection?

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

She answered truthfully, I don't know that she is innocent...

Everyone realizes the accuses is presumed innocent until proven guilty!

 

[cindysnow3]

Baez once again objecting to SA speaking objections. What kind of objection is that lol I laugh at his skills everyday

 

[beach]

I'm glad the judge read her the law. I think that will help her understand. She was confused about the law.

 

[coco puff]

His Honor had to restate the question for Baez. "Do you think Ms. Anthony, as she sits here today, that she is innocent"

 

[Apex-mom]

HHJP rehabilitated her... "i definitely can say she would be innocent now"

she got the POINT! good girl! we need her

SHESSSS A NURRRSSSEEEEEEE!!!! YIPEE

 

[coco puff]

She has a facebook acct. Does does not follow internet accts on the case and does not watch Dr. G. she is a nurse.

 

[beach]

I think I have a good read on this juror. I have heard other PTs answer exactly the same in real life. That is one reason I find her so credible.

 

[Chiquita71]

JB: I also have a couple of questions. It appears that you have seen some coverage a few years ago but not since then?

yes

JB: what stands out as the most memorable?

the missing child aspect probably stands out the most.

JB: did you see any coverage about the investigation?

the body being discovered and it being in a wooded area, who discovered the body...

JB: who did discover the body?

either a cable worker or a power person...(laughs) some kind of a worker...but I don't know why he would be in the wooded area but I am not sure.

JB: something previous about the person who discovered the body?

no.

JB: when the judge asked you about ICA presumption of innocence you said I guess so. Is that because you have been exposed to something previously or is that just how you answered.

I guess I answered that way because I really don't know. but I don't have a problem presuming her innocent.

JB: I don't want to mischaractorize what you just said, you guess you don't know or guess because that is what the judge will instruct you...no wrong answers.

I really don't have an answer, I would presume her innocent.

JB: as ICA sits here right now do you presume her innocent.

I don't know the answer so I don't know how to answer that question. I believe it is her right to a fair trial.

JB: but you don't know if she is innocent.

LDB: the revant issue is...

JB: object to speaking objections...

HHJP: you must presume or believe the defendant is innocent. this presumption stays with the defendant through out the preceedings. the state has the burden of proving evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. what the court the state and the defense want to know and only you know the answer...council said there is no right or wrong answer...the question is: as miss anthony sits here today whether or not you can presume she is innocent and until the state takes away that presumption with proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We know you are not lawyers, concepts new to you. Some can do that some can not. How definite you are.

I can say definitely she would be innocent.

JB: face book?

no

JB: twitter?

no

JB: followed this case on the internet?

no

JB: discovery health?

not really, I am a nurse I get enough of that at work.

JB: Dr. G show?

no

 

[KMouse]

Actually, we do have ONE seated juror right now. :sigh:

I agree..... ***sigh***

Is there any chance this juror can still be struck? She is the one that worries me the most (right now).

 

[Openmyeyes]

Morning all, sorry I'm late. Are we any closer? Not sure about this pj.

 

[logicalgirl]

HHJP reading the definition of innocent until proven guilty for clarification for the juror. Some people can do that - some people can't. Just tell us in your heart how definite you are. I can definitely say she is innocent.
Have you read or followed this case on the internet. No. No investigative discovery shows - I am a nurse and I get enough of that at work.

 

[MD MOMMY]

Cart before the horse, cart before the horse. I never wanna hear that again.

 

[cluciano63]

She is coming off as a kind of a blank slate as far as the case is concerned, or else she is trying to come across that way? I can't tell...

 

[Softail]

She is not against the DP, but doesn't have strong feelings either way. In some instances it is appropriate.

 

[kyrasmummy]

Sorry if this has been asked, but do all the jurors have to vote DP for ICA to recieve it or is it majority rules?

 

[hinman]

I agree..... ***sigh***

Is there any chance this juror can still be struck? She is the one that worries me the most (right now).

Have they already swore her in?

 

[El Gato]

Hi friends, I lurked long enough, I gotta a time out at the beginning cause I was snarky towards ICA but I am posting again