Discussion in 'Trial Archive - Threads and References' started by beach, Jun 26, 2011.
JA never mentioned the tattoo
It's 08:30 here and I had to crack open a beer.
He could probably kick this up a notch by playing some circus music in the background
sounds like JB is trying to confuse the jury on reasonable doubt.
The child abuse charges have nothing to do with Caylee's life BEFORE her demise. Ignorance, ignorance...
I don't think it's a good idea for the Defense to say "slut" in closing arguments. The jury will remember the Defense thinks Casey is a slut.
:maddening: JB is SO off on his "child abuse theory"...IMHO, sometimes the child abuse is invisible UNTIL it has risen to the ultimate ABUSE.............Death of the child!:sick: :twocents: IMHO :innocent: & experience!:rocker:
No concrete facts from Jb....as usual. Fast talking no substance. jmo
I see that to and was about to post it, you beat me to it lol
Whatever happened to drowning!?
Wonder how long JB will be able to talk about "nothing proven" since he can't use his unproven opening statement claims? :waitasec:
There's no evidence of child abuse? Oh really JB? Except for the DEAD BODY!!!
Most killers don't murder their victims in front of an audience, Mr. Baez.
I may have to change to a live feed where I don't see ICA's face. I'm so done with watching her.
umm... I think it can be proven and you still have questions. Pretty sure that happens all the time.
Thats right Jose.... No expense spared for justice for a murdered baby!
Man I knew Jose's argument would be lame, but this lameness surpasses the lameness I had envisioned, and is even lamer than the lamest lame..
oh there just aren't words lame enough.:banghead:
Interesting choice of words. And it followed "And that's as simple as it goes."
Can you believe he is actually.making.this.up.as.he.goes.along?
Wow. I am not impressed with Baez's closing statement so far. The state wasn't even trying to argue that Caylee was beaten or anything like that before she was killed, so what's the point?