Bobbywoo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,450
- Reaction score
- 5,967
Something I don't understand about CWW's lawyer saying he has proof his client was in MO and not FL at the time of the crime: if that proof existed, why was he arrested? I thought there had to be evidence of some sort before LE was allowed to arrest someone? The first thing my lawyer would do would be to show proof I wasn't there, it wasn't me and then they'd have to let me go? I assume detectives check out alibis before arresting someone?
LE wants to arrest the right person, right? Nobody wants egg on their face or the headaches that come with arresting someone just for the sake of an arrest.
To me, if CWW's lawyer had PROOF his client couldn't have done it because he wasn't there, CWW wouldn't be in jail. Is that naive to think that?
IMO sometimes LE makes the arrests and has the attorneys sort it out later. But this case and murder cases in general you would think they have all their ducks in a row before making an arrest. I hope they have more than the Walmart tape to go on because I have yet to see one that has a sharp, clear picture. Now I'm getring nervous. ..