4 years later, what do we think of the case / verdict now?

ZsaZsa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
11,037
Reaction score
15,303
I don't see anything about her on vacation in Hawaii anywhere. Maybe we're talking about different sites?

The Casey Anthony Boycott Information site that I checked said they were receiving death threats because so far the boycott efforts were successfully keeping Ms. Anthony from brokering a deal. They even claimed to have filed a police report.

If that site is accurate and whatever site you're referring to is accurate, maybe whoever paid her vacation expenses did so in fear of their lives due to her tantrums and fits of rage.

The information about her going to Hawaii is (was) in the comments re the article on Roy Kronk's lawsuit . Yesterday they posted a photo said to have been taken by her in Hawaii and detailed that this was an all expenses (paid by McKenna P.I.) vacation, according to her Twitter posts. When I looked a while ago they have retracted that statement as they are not sure of the source..
https://www.facebook.com/Casey-Anthony-Boycott-Information-172941139555655/
 

strawberry

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
12,044
Reaction score
2,615
I don't see anything about her on vacation in Hawaii anywhere. Maybe we're talking about different sites?

The Casey Anthony Boycott Information site that I checked said they were receiving death threats because so far the boycott efforts were successfully keeping Ms. Anthony from brokering a deal. They even claimed to have filed a police report.

If that site is accurate and whatever site you're referring to is accurate, maybe whoever paid her vacation expenses did so in fear of their lives due to her tantrums and fits of rage.

Same here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ZsaZsa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
11,037
Reaction score
15,303
Same here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Take a look at the post about Roy Kronk- yesterday there were details about her trip to Hawaii, with a photograph. If you check the replies to Lisa Kelly, they have now posted a retraction saying they weren't sure of the authenticity so are waiting confirmation before going further.
 

The Farm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
10,931
Reaction score
7,502
No, not quite. According to the Boycott Casey Anthony facebook site, she is on an all expense paid vacation in Hawaii....

I want to vomit right now. How is that possible?
 

jkly

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
621
Reaction score
742
The information about her going to Hawaii is (was) in the comments re the article on Roy Kronk's lawsuit . Yesterday they posted a photo said to have been taken by her in Hawaii and detailed that this was an all expenses (paid by McKenna P.I.) vacation, according to her Twitter posts. When I looked a while ago they have retracted that statement as they are not sure of the source..
https://www.facebook.com/Casey-Anthony-Boycott-Information-172941139555655/

Thanks for the info.

I guess they're assuming the kisssykiss twitter is really her then? Or was it under the case photography twitter?

Oh well. I don't care enough to check. Whether they are or are not her, both of those accounts were nauseating the first time I looked at them.

I think if Casey was really in Hawaii, DM would have coincidentally caught her at the airport ready to depart with that huge cheesy horse-faced grin on her face. We know she's the one who calls them and gets them to take these "candid shots" of her. She likes to rub it in.
 

strawberry

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
12,044
Reaction score
2,615
Yes people think the kissykiss and/ or casephoto one is her but I don't until I see proof


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

RANCH

United we stand, divided we fall.
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
16,891
Reaction score
32,961
Yes people think the kissykiss and/ or casephoto one is her but I don't until I see proof


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is no proof that these Facebook sites/posts/comments are factual. They're just Internet rumors.

I'm not sure why these rumors are being posted. What value do they have?
 

strawberry

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
12,044
Reaction score
2,615
So west palm beach is under mandatory evacuation..wonder where she'll go


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Hez

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
45
So west palm beach is under mandatory evacuation..wonder where she'll go


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BBM - I can come up with a few suggestions, but they aren't nice. :happydance:
 

watcher9

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
7,772
Reaction score
8,960
This is no longer available. Can you tell us what it was about?

I couldn't get that link either but I tried searching and found the bad news....
Of course, nothing comes out until long after the trial.

Her bodyguard Rob Dick has apparently admitted that he knew Casey killed Caylee.
Apparently, this is going to come out in an interview on a show featuring an re-enactment of infamous crimes called Scandal That Made Me Famous. The episode about FCA will premiere Saturday night 12-17 at 9pm on the channel Reelz.

I hope and pray that this is just a rerun of an old show with old clips and that she is not getting paid any money for this.

http://people.com/crime/casey-anthonys-guilty-former-body-guard-interview/

http://www.reelz.com/schedule/?showid=&date=17-12-2016
 

HMSHood

Admiral-Class Battlecruiser
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
4,274
Reaction score
2,741
Could Casey Anthony be an injustice collector? This is something I have pondered in the past. The term injustice collector often arises with someone going on a killing spree or terrorist attack. Columbine, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Isla Vista, Charleston, Orlando, Utoya, Nice, Paris, Beslan, and 9/11 come to mind. There are also non-mass killers who are injustice collectors like Jodi Arias, Lori Drew, Gertrude Baniszewski, Yoselyn Ortega, Susan Wright, and Betty Broderick. There are serial killers who would be considered injustice collectors like Richard Ramirez, Todd Kohlhepp, Aileen Wuornos, John Wayne Gacy, and Charles Manson.

Identifying The Next Mass Murderer—Before It’s Too Late
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...ntifying-the-next-mass-murderer-it-s-too-late

Murderous Envy
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/keeping-kids-safe/200905/murderous-envy

Injustice Collectors
http://www.psybersquare.com/family/family_injustice.html

1.) Injustice Collectors are convinced that they are never wrong. How is it possible that they are never wrong? It is simple: They are always right.

2.) Injustice Collectors never apologize. Ever. For anything.

3.) Injustice Collectors truly believe that they are morally and ethically superior to others and that others chronically do not hold themselves to the same high standards as the injustice collector does.

4.) Injustice Collectors make the rules, break the rules and enforce the rules of the family. They are a combined legislator, police, and judge and jury of

5.) Injustice Collectors never worry about what is wrong with themselves as their "bad list" grows. Their focus is always on the failings of others.

6.) Injustice Collectors are never upset by the disparity of their rules for others with their own expectations of themselves.

7.) Injustice Collectors rationalize their own behavior with great ease and comfort.

Looking at it, Casey Anthony shows characteristics of injustice collector, which are 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

Injustice collectors are very negative and envious people. There is no doubt that she envied Caylee Anthony as she was getting attention from her parents. Casey Anthony would of held grudges as a result. Caylee was a tipping point for her. Casey Anthony would of harbored grudges for a long time in all likelihood. Casey has an overinflated ego and it destroys her ego. She has a history of being a constant complainer, especially when things did not go her way.

Websleuth Radio Interview Of Tina Meier describing Lori Drew
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/websleuths/2013/09/30/tricias-true-crime-radio-adult-cyber-bullying

It is at the 20:40 mark, Tina Meier's description of Lori Drew. Meier describes her as a very talkative person who complained nonstop. She is described as unhappy and resentful at society. She is in a unhappy marriage. She was very envious of other people and thought her life was a living Hell. That easily describes Casey Anthony right there. This also describes Jodi Arias, Yoselyn Ortega, Elliot Rodger, Eric Harris, Adam Lanza, Omar Mateen, 9/11 Terrorists, Osama bin Laden, and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Like them, they are highly negative people who make their own lives miserable.

WEB OF LIES: Deadly Cyberbullying Case of Missouri Teen Unravelled Tonight on ID (Video Preview)
http://tvruckus.com/2015/01/28/web-...-teen-unravelled-tonight-on-id-video-preview/

ID Web of Lies did a show about Megan Meier. I have watched it. Just watching the show, Lori Drew shows similarities with Casey Anthony or Jodi Arias. It is like watching them along with the likes of Elliot Rodger or Osama bin Laden. They are both highly narcissistic, infantile, and resentful. They are very sociable and seen as annoying. Fitting in is more of an issue with Drew. Not as with Anthony and Arias. They do not expect have long lasting relationships. They are all very repressed.

Anthony, Drew, and Arias are borderline narcissists. All three are very sensitive to rejection and feel abandoned. Drew lashed out at Megan because she stopped being friends with Sarah. Arias killed Travis Alexander after they broke up. Note, they happened months or even a year before they struck. They have distorted images of themselves and other people as their thinking is black and white. They are consumed by self-hatred.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
Personally I think that the jury made the right decision based on what was before them now, even though I didn't think that when the verdict came down, I wonder if other people have also had another look at all the evidence and feel that way, or do you still feel the same way you did back in 2011?

How can you say that?
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
based on the fact there was no way to tell how Caylee actually died, the jury had no other choice, in my opinion, but to find Casey not guilty.

Whydo-you-need-to-know-how-she-died?-you-don't-need-a-cause-of-death-to-prove-malicious-intent.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
If the 'foolproof suffication' and 'foolproof suffocation' searches made by Casey (using the Mozilla Firefox browser, which was ONLY ever used by Casey under her profile on the computer) would have been found by the prosecution, I think there was a good chance that a smart jury would have found her guilty. However, that jury was more interested in getting on with their summer plans than in actual justice, so she probably would have walked if that information was available anyway.

they did present that evidence though.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
I viewed the whole trial free from the taint of Nancy Grace-like "justice" sites hyping the case day after day after day, and thus watched the proceedings entirely dependent on the legal process and the courtroom issues pursued by the People and the defense via questions and answers in sworn testimony. Based on its presentation to judge and jury the prosecution did not deserve to win that case. The State of Florida has itself to blame.

Not true at all. The prosecution proved murder in the first degree, endangerment of a child and abuse of a child beyond any reasonable doubt.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
I've never been one that liked opening cans of worms. Then again, I don't care for worms much anyway. I certainly don't understand the need for it 4 years post-verdict.

For me - I have absolutely zero desire to revisit the nightmare of that jury's verdict. It's over. She walked. She murdered Caylee and she walked free. That jury wasn't even conscientious enough to convict her on the negligence charge though she didn't report her missing for 31 days. That verdict was excruciatingly painful to hear (much less accept) for those of us who spent countless days/nights actually sleuthing tens of thousands of pages of documents and evidence items and know what the evidence proves. Took me years to be able to come to some sort of terms of acceptance - even that of "It is what it is and she will not be tried again for Caylee's murder. For my own peace of mind, I'll have to accept that she will face a higher Judge in the afterlife."

So, for those of you who find this beneficial, enjoy the discussion. For me, it is a horror that I have no desire to relive.

Whyisit-a-can-of-worms-to-revisit-facts?
 

beach

Verified Expert
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
18,370
Reaction score
4,469
Whyisit-a-can-of-worms-to-revisit-facts?

Revisiting the FACTS (evidence) isn't the can of worms I was referencing. The topic " 4 years later - What do we THINK [emphasis mine] about the case /verdict" is what I was referencing.

I know the evidence very, very well. I spent an embarrassing amount of hours here every. single. day. for over 3 years finely combing through tens of thousands of pages of discovery. Evidence including, but certainly not limited to - fiber, duct tape, chloroform, cell phone pings, computer forensics, DNA, autopsy results, countess sworn statements & depositions. I never missed a single hearing, including the Frye hearings, nor did I miss one minute of the trial. Simply, I personally don't feel the need to review any of the evidence again.

I'm more than satisfied that, in my heart, I know the jury got it terribly wrong. It's now been over 5 years since that verdict was rendered and when I allow myself to revisit that day it still elicits strong emotions - anger, sadness, disappointment, disgust... for my own well-being it's best for me to not dwell on what I know was a terrible injustice.

I still think about sweet Caylee daily. 8 1/2 years since she was first reported missing and her photo still remains as my profile pic on my page. I'll always be dedicated to her. :heartbeat:
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
260
Reaction score
17
Revisiting the FACTS (evidence) isn't the can of worms I was referencing. The topic " 4 years later - What do we THINK [emphasis mine] about the case /verdict" is what I was referencing.

I know the evidence very, very well. I spent an embarrassing amount of hours here every. single. day. for over 3 years finely combing through tens of thousands of pages of discovery. Evidence including, but certainly not limited to - fiber, duct tape, chloroform, cell phone pings, computer forensics, DNA, autopsy results, countess sworn statements & depositions. I never missed a single hearing, including the Frye hearings, nor did I miss one minute of the trial. Simply, I personally don't feel the need to review any of the evidence again.

I'm more than satisfied that, in my heart, I know the jury got it terribly wrong. It's now been over 5 years since that verdict was rendered and when I allow myself to revisit that day it still elicits strong emotions - anger, sadness, disappointment, disgust... for my own well-being it's best for me to not dwell on what I know was a terrible injustice.

I still think about sweet Caylee daily. 8 1/2 years since she was first reported missing and her photo still remains as my profile pic on my page. I'll always be dedicated to her. :heartbeat:

i agree. the people creating the can of worms are the ones refusing to see the facts.
 
Top