TTF14
Spaceship Headlight Pattern Expert
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,645
- Reaction score
- 60,131
No. That's not what anybody is saying and that doesn't even make any sense.
I'm more concerned about evidence of OTHER ACTORS being lost.
No. That's not what anybody is saying and that doesn't even make any sense.
My translation:
“Judge we have not been able to go through everything because we have been too busy trying to save our own rears. We were doing OK until our client…uh, hmmm….what’s-his-name, started confessing to the murders to anybody with a pulse. Then we had to pull out our copy of “Defense Lawyering for Dummies” which instructed us to sign up for a creative writing class. After completing an online course plus an add-on class on Norse Mythology, we wrote a Frank’s motion for the ages according to several 7th and 8th grade teachers nationwide, who may or may not have been financially compensated by us. After that it was all about us.”
and? Is this now part of the discovery they're saying they now have but haven't looked at, so they want it and are asking for it to be supplied again, for some reason, of course, other than having the State spend more money giving them duplicate discovery they then don't look at? Quite the viscous and costly circus....um circle. The word "critical" is also subjective...especially when used by this defense team. AJMOThe D were originally granted a 33 page critical report from the ISP. It turns out there was a missing attachment. When they did receive that attachment, 33 pages jumped to 272 pages.
Kidnapping is already included since he was charged with felony murder.I am trying to get as much information as possible.
The original charges PLUS new murder charges stand.
The new kidnapping charges are dismissed.
That doesn't remove the original charges is what I am being told.
JMO
Agree. At a bare minimum losing evidence in an unsolved double homicide doesn't inspire confidence.No. That's not what anybody is saying and that doesn't even make any sense.
I'm more concerned about evidence of OTHER ACTORS being lost.
Read #12 of their compel motion...(paraphrasing) they said they might have it but they don't know for sure so they want it. hummmThey can't lie. Are you saying they do have phone data and are saying they don't?
I hope they do. Because if they don't, HUGE problem.Read #12 of their compel motion...(paraphrasing) they said they might have it but they don't know for sure so they want it. hummm
No. That's not what anybody is saying and that doesn't even make any sense.
I'm more concerned about evidence of OTHER ACTORS being lost.
unsurprising if true. jmoYouTuber and defense witness, Rick Snay, was involved in a scuffle and kicked out of court house! Unbelievable.
YouTuber and defense witness, Rick Snay, was involved in a scuffle and kicked out of court house! Unbelievable.
That’s a valid concern @TTF14No. That's not what anybody is saying and that doesn't even make any sense.
I'm more concerned about evidence of OTHER ACTORS being lost.
None."The prosecutors" (name of podcast, not the delphi P team) ... doth protest too much, methinks.
But it's cute how they are standing up for McL.
They get it.
McL's been handed a messy mess with having to chase down various discovery from various LE investigation lines, multiple LE organizations ... only to learn that not-a-small amount of discovery has been ... lost.
Anyone know what youtubers/podcasts snarky comments are we permitted to post on the Delphi threads?
jmho
I agree wholeheartedly. It's the way law is written that's to blame sometimes for things you'd think are common sense but in the legal world are interrupted differently.I'm thoroughly confused. I thought the theory was that RA, as BG, walked up to the girls on the bridge, threatened them with the gun, then led them down the hill. In what alternate universe is that not kidnapping?
They may have them and just not come across them yet? I just thought of another possible scenario. Maybe the replacements/old attorneys may have misplaced stuff...before returning it to AB&BR, after the SC ruled them back in the driver's seat? It's possible, JMOYes, Agree. Of course they CAN lie. They are physically able to. But not without ramifications.
I believe they did not lie when they said they do have the phone records/dumps of Mike, Becky, Kelsi, and Cody.
And that is a huge problem.
Or throw out the cartridge, anything electronic, and the confessions. (Oh! Is that all?)The D just wants more money. And bullying.
Hope the Prosecution has receipts, then the huge problem falls in the D's lap. But they're on the record now as being understaffed, underpaid and overworked, so they have an out.I hope they do. Because if they don't, HUGE problem.