I hear you! I'm always the one, when some tech goes awry with a glitchy tech problem who says, somewhat sarcastically, "Aahhh isn't technology grand!". But in fact, it truly can be grand in the courtroom
I believe he did it or was part of it. It’s hard to imagine he left before the kids did when a witness puts him on the bridge as the kids approach it.
Wow Cyber sleuth, good catch on that! That's very disturbing.
Well, I’ve noted this before but…. At the beginning the defense did ask JG for funds for an investigator and we never heard whether or not she granted them one. I’ve previously considered Mw may have been in that role and have asserted same before but maybe it was TC (if anyone at all)?
It would probably fall under more inadmissible conspiracy theorizing? I suppose IF there was indisputable scientific proof it could be allowed into testimony to impeach a witness. But not just, I was with so and so that day and they were high. It would be a he/she said vs he/she said...not admissible?
Then could we say TC was untruthful when he answered questions beginning on page 4 line 18 when he testified about his current job and his previous job and his connection to the Delphi investigation in years prior?
Exactly. And why would the Odinist white supremacist ritualists want to murder two young Caucasian girls anyway? And then why would the innocent neighborhood drug store guy go on to confess to killing those two young girls over 20 times. What are the staggering odds of this fantastical perfect storm occurring? Not very, IMO
He was a wonderful expert witness!
Also note date of link? January 2023.Delphi murder suspect files motion to use public funds to hire a private investigator
Attorneys for Richard Allen, the Delphi murders suspect, either has hired a private investigator or will hire one soon.www.indystar.com
Maybe he literally can’t if he was hired as a private investigator given the ex-parte communication and JG’s ruling on it was sealed?? Just a thought.
You got that right, disclosure of being a hired investigator, paid or pro bono would be appropriate in that situation, I would think. JMO
Yes!! Totally agreed. BG may actually be an SK. Or... maybe not. But just because he left this highly unusual CS doesn't mean it's a band of crazed fringe Odinites. It could still be a-- highly unusual lone killer. And that may be why BG was destined to always be a lone killer. Other cold-blooded murderers don't want to waste their time making symbols on trees, getting branches for "reasons" not more immediately grounded in reality. No matter what, we know this murderer is a very (!!) unusual person with an incredibly (and horrifyingly) twisted way of thinking. Anyone with any exposure to Odinism at any time in his twisted life could have become acquainted with runes. BG could have left those Odinite "clues" to mislead LE or he could have left them because they somehow align with his own twisted mindset in some way that would be unknown to pretty much all who knew him. Some symbols at a CS do not a band of crazed Odinists make.
11/22/2022: Motion for Order Prohibiting the Parties, Counsel, Law Enforcement Officials, Court Personnel, Coroner, and Family Members from Disseminating Information or Releasing Any Extra-Judicial Statements by Means of Public Communication filed by State of Indiana.
Kudos on your research.
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
I agree with you. I think RA committed the murders as well based on the narratives he gave in 2017. He said he was there between 1:30-3:30 and walked across both the Freedom Bridge and the High Monan Bridge. He said he did not see anyone else at the High Bridge which is hard to believe considering photos show that Libby and Abby had begun walking across it by 2:14 PM. Also, if he himself wasn’t BG than IMO he possibly should have had a high likelihood of crossing or spotting this figure as well but such occurrence is not mentioned in his narrative. RA also stated in 2017 that he parked at the CPS building. The affidavit notes that a witness spotted a singular car parked at the CPS building and the description she gave was similar to that of one RA’s two cars. Similar to what another witness described BG wearing, RA also advised LE in 2022 that he wore a blue or black Carhatt jacket, blue jeans and a head covering. RA description of himself that matches that of BG given by 4 witnesses who were on the bridge. Furthermore, no other visitors who were on the trails that day between 2:14-4:30 PM recall seeing RA despite him stating he walked the same trails as before to get back to his vehicle.
If RA is innocent, then why didn't he see Abby and Libby? I believe as with most killers, RA told some truth, but he couldn't bring himself to say he saw Abby and Libby. He sees others who also saw him, but when it comes to the girls, he didn't see them, didn't see the killer and I find it odd that no witnesses saw this man walking back the way he came on the trail to get to his car. So several people see him as he walks from the Freedom bridge and on to the Monan High Bridge, but then nobody sees him walk back and nobody sees Abby and Libby after the BB sees them walking toward the bridge where BB sees a man out on the platform where RA himself says he walked out to.
Wow is right! What if Judge Gull caught on long ago to many of these tactics of the defense and what appears to be bias is just her not catering to any more of this type of stuff.
