Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 9,140
- Reaction score
- 61,548
We were laughing at ourselves, someone saw a goat, someone, binoculars, a puppy. To be honest, it is impossible to see anything in that blurry bridge apparition. It might be helpful, but clearing the image didn't do much, as we now see.
In this case, I see a chain of misfortunes and investigative mistakes, interspersed with questionable decisions. If you live in a tiny, old house and invite TV into it in the hope of gaining national fame, be prepared that all your cockroaches and mice, local pedophiles, catfishers, corrupt judges and odinites will be on national TV as well.
Now, what will stay in history of the Delphi case, the advancements or the drawbacks? I look at other cases, it seems that "police mistakes" take precedence (see Christina Jessop case.) At least with a rapid solution and a long court battle, the case may go down in history with "+" (Idaho, m.b.? We shall see.) But any dragging, illogical and immensely resource-consuming case invites only criticism. JMO.
In this case, I see a chain of misfortunes and investigative mistakes, interspersed with questionable decisions. If you live in a tiny, old house and invite TV into it in the hope of gaining national fame, be prepared that all your cockroaches and mice, local pedophiles, catfishers, corrupt judges and odinites will be on national TV as well.
Now, what will stay in history of the Delphi case, the advancements or the drawbacks? I look at other cases, it seems that "police mistakes" take precedence (see Christina Jessop case.) At least with a rapid solution and a long court battle, the case may go down in history with "+" (Idaho, m.b.? We shall see.) But any dragging, illogical and immensely resource-consuming case invites only criticism. JMO.