katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 67,877
- Reaction score
- 238,865
There may not be solid proof, but this does not seem like a child just wandering off, IMO.You see diligence. I see scores of people being thrown in jail and named in the press without solid proof of a crime.
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
MOO
This is a rural area, with roads and homes. The child was not in a remote area where he would be hopelessly lost. He is an intelligent 5 yr old and was not far from where his grandmother and father were. He could have easily found them, given the chance to do so.
If this was just a lost child, why all the tampering of the crime scene, and made up accusations? Why would someone plant his shoe in th wrong location?
And why would someone make false accusations, swearing in court that another couple ran him over. There was even blood found in the car and damages on th exterior. And those seem to have been falsified---so more tampering, in order to frame someone.
WHY frame others with a serious crime if this is a simple case of a child who simply wandered off?
Why does the Police Commissioner lie in his reports and urge some of his officers to falsify their logs?
I agree there is no solid evidence yet, that we know of---but that seems to be because of all the deflections and tampering and deceitful testimony. I've never seen all that in a simple case of a lost child. JMO