Have been following this case but have been away travelling so not replying.
I am quite bemused/perplexed by the number of people proposing alternative theories like framing, or the teenagers being responsible for mistaken mushroom identification, or that the deceased getting sick at another meal on the same day. As far as I know, there's been nothing to suggest at all that another meal may be the issue. Even EP acknowledges her meal is the problem, hence why she also "got sick". It seems pretty clear that the Beef Wellington is the source of the poisoned food.
I guess it's fun to be devil's advocate but some of the propositions seem incredibly far-fetched. Is it just that people want to give the benefit of the doubt or do people really see something in EP that makes you feel she would not be capable? I am really curious as I am a big believer in Occams Razor, though I would be quite willing to be blindsided by an alternative!
There are only two theories I personally (IMHO, MOO) could consider:
1) Someone did switch out the mushrooms and EP was the intended target. Very reasonable theory, though that person would have to be confident the teens would not also eat the meal or
2) EP intended to make the guests ill but not die.
The later seeming unlikely given how aware how poisonous death caps are.
MOO
The theories come for one reason:
- AFAIK, no one reported that amanita phalloides toxin was found in Beef Wellington. Or did I miss anything?
- we don't have any report on the dehydrator contents
- we don't know the results of the post mortems.
- we also don't fully know the story, who left whom, and why. And, if there are new people in their lives.
Logically, yes, it looks like if one person serves food and four of her guests have symptoms of poisoning and three died, and one barely survived, then the poisoner is most likely going to be the host. IMO, this is what could have happened.
Only now the host has to get away with it.
We expect LE to find traces of the said poison in the bodies, and in the food.
What if there is none?
Then the poi gets away with it.
Unless another poison will be looked for, and found.
The idea of blaming it on amanita is great, because mushroom poisoning can be accidental. If Coumadin or thallium is found in food or drink, it will be harder to explain. (Could be anything, btw. I just know of these two). So all I would like to see is that no one blindly follows amanita lead alone. Because EP might come across as a naive loner who believes in unicorns, but a woman amassing a decent portfolio is in no way stupid. She is a smart planner. And if she keeps shelves of mushroom books in her library, chances are, she wants it to be blamed on mushrooms because mushroom poisonings are usually random and can be accidental. She might have even added a tad of amanita toxin but the main poison could be different.
And it is very possible that she invited the whole group hoping that Simon would come, as I am not quite sure her goal was to get back with him. She probably wants a divorce, and custody of the kids, and all her money. Simon didn't show up. EP didn't count on it.
(As to why not change the food to a not poisoned one seeing that he didn't come. This would have been logical. This would make me think that the poison was in something served early. Or maybe, they didn't tell her Simon would not show up).
`•
Another version - she is set up by another party, because of the same, money and children. Less likely, but at least there is a motive.