Firstly, no offense intended at all to anyone and of course your all free to post whatever you like, but... seriously, will someone please explain where all of this is going?
Theres been such a large amount of data posted recently so clearly theres some research being done, but, how any of it ties into any particular theory or what that theory is exactly, is still a complete mystery to me.
Lots of maybes and this could've happened, but minus a theory, how can we decide the scenarios? Without a scenario, how can we know what info is important & what can be ruled in and out? Well we cant, its impossible!!
What I am seeing posted is just some of many hundreds of various pieces of information and possibilities that may or may not be relevant at all. Trying to start by gathering info about every single thing that may form part of a scenario is pointless bcoz its endless & takes you nowhere. Its just info. All still to be determined if its relevant because we dont know what its supposed to form a part or if it fits into a theory we havent even heard yet. I dont get it at all.
An example - stating its possible that someone missing for 20 years could have been placed underground and then pursuing every conceivable place underground is ludicrous. Talk about getting bogged down by unnecessary details. For starters, is not a theory its a statement. It gives us an idea of the kind of information we need to consider to fit a particular scenario. Deciding whether its the most likely scenario to pursue only needs to be done if it best fits into your theory.
So can we hear about some possible theories please before we go any further with this?
If your interested, the theory Im most drawn to is that he took her on his own from claremont to an intermediary place close by and left her the night she was taken, giving himself enough time while it was still dark to return home. There is limited possible scenarios to fall into that theory. Firstly, by the time he got her into the car and out of the immediate area, it would have been at least 2.20am so to be safe, he has about 2 hrs of total darkness left. Im either going to KK and leaving her closer to Claremont which gives me a radius of about 10km max that I need to travel in total before I dont have a deceased person in my car anymore when its getting light. So, that'd suggest he had 1hr tops to spend wherever he went before needing to move on again.
Otherwise, Im heading out closer to where Im going to leave her so I can stop in between, then go to the d site and get out of there in that short amount of time. That suggests to me its likely to be a southern location & it makes sense to have headed down the coast to Rockingham Rd then gone inland somewhere around Russell Rd. Plenty of secluded wetlands & natural bush with few houses back then. If he chose inland Id say shes close to JR site, probably not so far down, but in a area with a far more waterlogged environment. Alternately, if she was left closer the coast, maybe even as close as the bush around Woodman Point, there'd be less people venturing into the bush at summertime due to snakes and theres plenty of foxes about who'd make certain shes wasnt found.
Another possibility Ive only considered recently is that he took her home and moved her on a different day. In that case shes probably E/SE and shes been buried so I dont think its possible she'll be found unless we're told where she is. If I was going to pursue a place to look, it would have to be in a somewhat sandy location fairly close to Claremont, or I wouldn't bother because I dont think there'd be a hope you could find her now anywhere else.
The one thing I certainly wont be doing is driving down to the where I have the family boat moored, transporting her onto it and setting off into the ocean to find some beach I can pull straight up onto the shore on then lugging her off again in the hope I might come across some unused windmill to bury her under. (Ok I know thats not what was being suggested exactly but you get my point). Theres no chance Im heading 44km west of Rotto to put her into a trench either. In fact, a boats the last place Id be going with such limited time because its the most likely place I'd run into other people at that time of the morning, especially after Australia Day. But thats just me and Im not a SK so what do I know, I could be totally wrong. I do know that Drabble Rd is in Scarborough though.
Lastly, I've been fascinated by "the line" over the years too. I do know for certain that almost all of the coordinates posted cant be relied upon exactly & some are very rough at best. Very recently, I set out to to dispel my curiosity & try to find any evidence of it being a mere coincidence - which I was absolutely able to do, too well in fact. I took the first two completely unrelated murders that I was aware of & plotted them & was really surprised they fit onto the line. One of them would have every person who believes in it jumping up & down claiming the CSK was definitely responsible, but they're not, someone else did it and it was random. Af first I thought it couldnt have been as close as it was, I must've got it wrong so I asked a computer nerd mate to check it & map accurately. I was shocked to the core to find it passed straight over the exact spot, and I mean exact. Thats if the midpoint is accurate though, which I think it is. So for me, I'm calling BS on the line unless we learn its a fact from someone who knows for sure and can prove it. And then I'll be freaking out about this unrelated coincidence even more Id say.
Anyway, thats all I have to say. My apologies to anyone who got this far into such a long post & wondered why they bothered.