Memory is a funny thing, in fact barristers debate for days on end about memory sometimes. JH said she saw the billboard and it rung a bell and prior to that hadn’t thought of the interaction (paraphrasing her evidence not a direct quote). The police on their own website advertising the rewards say that they want to hear from people with any tips even if the information seems small or insignificant. It’s entirely possible that JH saw a woman and thought it best to tell police just incase it was Marion.Are we allowed to sleuth her / this situation?
Something is very wrong here and it's the only thing we've got.
Why would a retired bank manager insert herself into such a situation looking for reward money, seems very unlikely to me? However, would they be motivated to cover up making a grave error that was breach of banking conduct?
Can a person be stripped of their pension if they did something that means they should have been sacked before their retirement?
The bank evidence was hard for the podcast to ascertain and was also difficult to get straight at the inquest back at the earlier tranches. Different bank employees through the course of the podcast have had different interpretations of the procedures back then.
IMO there’s nothing to suggest anyone at the bank did anything wrong at all.