- Joined
- Sep 13, 2021
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 614
Spedding had an alibi for years , and police ignored itYes obviously not everyone on the planet can provide an alibi, but was everyone on the planet at some stage a POI in this case?
Spedding had an alibi for years , and police ignored itYes obviously not everyone on the planet can provide an alibi, but was everyone on the planet at some stage a POI in this case?
Or perhaps FFC, trying to overcome WT’s fear of heights, sits him on the balcony railing - “No Mummy, it’s too high” and struggles to get down, but falls. Maybe not a “genuine accident”, but possibly enough culpability to warrant a covert disposal of his body.My apologies to longer-time Posters if this scenario has already been proposed, but if (as LE are now theorising) William was involved with a fall from the balcony the following occurred:
William was climbing up on the balcony railing, and the FFC tried to pull him from there; in that process he struggled and fell over the railing and down onto the ground below losing and not regaining consciousness.
FFC would be mortified, and would very quickly have the thought running through her head that there would be an Inquiry into what had occurred e.g. had it been an accident or a purposeful act?
Horrific to think of, but a possibility, MOO
The FA theory is the one that has been given the most attention in recent months. TV etc.
The car which interested me the most, in relation to FA, is the car which belonged to DP. An old blue car in need of a respray. It was supposedly caught on traffic cameras at around 3pm on the day WT went missing. DP said he was not driving the car that day - it was suggested that FA was driving this car.
It would tie in with the timeframe for RP completing his dialysis treatment - but this is just a suggestion.
For the life of me, I have searched for the news source for this - I cannot find it. It would have been the inquest. All IMO at the moment.
From now on whenever media says 'Shock Twist' I will know, for a fact that there is definitely no shock or a twist .. they have worn out both terms IMO.
Yes, as I said, I haven't yet found a case where a parent (foster or biological) has buried/hidden a child who died from a genuine accident.
From now on whenever media says 'Shock Twist' I will know, for a fact that there is definitely no shock or a twist .. they have worn out both terms IMO.
Or perhaps FFC, trying to overcome WT’s fear of heights, sits him on the balcony railing - “No Mummy, it’s too high” and struggles to get down, but falls. Maybe not a “genuine accident”, but possibly enough culpability to warrant a covert disposal of his body.
Pure speculation, obviously.
I don’t understand the point you’re making sorry?Spedding had an alibi for years , and police ignored it
Just double checked and it opens easily for me. Could take a screenshot for you, but would that breach copyright?This "news article" starts off ...
That "7NEWS investigation can reveal" is suppose to link to a supportive document to back it up with substance. However, it leads to ... a 404 error (dead link).
NO ALIBI: Shock twist in investigation into missing toddler William Tyrrell
7NEWS understands police asked Abbott about his movements on the day William disappeared.
He has been unable to find someone to vouch for his movements but maintains he had nothing to do with the disappearance.
Case witness Steve, whose true identity is suppressed by a court order, claims a lot of evidence points to Abbott.
“I believe that he, Frank, dropped (friend Ray Porter) off at hospital and had access to Ray’s car,” Steve told 7NEWS.
It is not clear to me what a “genuine accident” is, but putting that aside, do you have a link to anything where it is said that the POI had no role in the fall - i.e. through any act of commission or omission?Yes, as I said, I haven't yet found a case where a parent (foster or biological) has buried/hidden a child who died from a genuine accident.
This "news article" starts off ...
That "7NEWS investigation can reveal" is suppose to link to a supportive document to back it up with substance. However, it leads to ... a 404 error (dead link).
If now viewing and focussing on the FFC as a potential POI, we are able to think that we can detect cryptic clues in the words of so many of her statements (Opposites: e.g. "No Mummy, it;s too high"; she saw 2 cars parked across the road), told like a story, one could compile into a list. By focussing on those said 'cryptic clues' and unpacking them, some answers to what actually occurred might unfold.
MOO
This "news article" starts off ...
That "7NEWS investigation can reveal" is suppose to link to a supportive document to back it up with substance. However, it leads to ... a 404 error (dead link).
It is not clear to me what a “genuine accident” is, but putting that aside, do you have a link to anything where it is said that the POI had no role in the fall - i.e. through any act of commission or omission?
I was involved in many fatalities which were accidental, but where third parties were not blameless.
Sorry. Don't have time to help atm.Thank you. This news article reports on the theory of RP's white car being used. I am trying to find DP's blue car. Both in the area at the same time, both caught on traffic cameras.