Wexford
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,066
- Reaction score
- 4,079
Coincidence?
The Press Council has considered whether its Standards of Practice were breached ........
The publication said it had accurately reported details of what it said was a major development in the police investigation into the disappearance of William Tyrrell, missing since September 2014. It said in reporting on these developments, it had taken steps to offer several opportunities to Mr Spedding and his family to address the police interest in him. Although Mr Spedding declined to comment, a close friend “had spoken on his behalf” and his comments defending Mr Spedding were prominently featured in the article. The publication also said the article was balanced and not limited to reporting on Mr Spedding as it had also reported another line of enquiry, the police search of a local caravan park.
http://www.presscouncil.org.au/document-search/adj-1651/
"Police came here. They wanted to have a look through even though I'd been through that cabin since. We went down because obviously there might have been a body in there or [the police] thought there could be."
The owner said he gave the address of the couple to police and "away they went".
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/caravan-p...iam-tyrell-20150121-12ux0y.html#ixzz3oyPvPxRH
The caravan park offered balanced reporting Puggle .... hmm.
BBM
This is an odd comment and makes me think that the cabin was privately owned. If it was just rented surely the owner/manager would have gone in to clean it for the next person. A cabin that is owned might be kept differently unless the van park rents it out for the owner. He doesnt say he went in to clean it, just that he went through because he thought there might have been 'a body'???