Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When it comes to crime there's always one eye on the prize and the other doesnt see what they are missing.
Unless he was traded for favours.
It could be similar to this.
Im thinking if this case ever gets solved , the dunbogan connection and the caravan crying child connection will play a part in this
Karma will get them dont worry it may take time.
We were all kids once, a relo of mine was nearly taken in 83.
Keep them safe and always tell them not to talk to strangers, we all were told that years ago.
I wonder who would take care of William for 3½ years. With no contact from his parents/grandmother, as I would think they would have been monitored for this type of thing (despite the parents being cleared). With no Centrelink payments for William, because where did this child come from, suddenly? William would be an expense, as well as a risk.
I was nearly taken myself, when I was about 8 years old, in England. An 'old' (who knows actually how old) man took my hand while I was walking home from school, walked with me, kept telling me he wanted to take me home to show his wife my pretty hair.
I was shy, and scared, but had the sense to pull my hand away and run from him, after about 10 mins or so. Yelled to him that my dad was waiting for me. I was a latchkey kid after school, till my parents got home from work. School was quite close to my home.
I never told a soul for years and years, scared I would get in trouble, I guess. But I will never forget it.
Needless to say, my own child was never, ever a latchkey kid.
.
Conversely, when I was around the same age (8ish) I was shopping with my mum in a busy market. Got myself lost and crying, when I was allowed to go from the bus stop to a nearby shop to buy lollies (there were lots of different bus stops, I returned to the wrong one). Mum didn't come with me because she was toting so many grocery bags, and I was pestering her for lollies.
A nice girl/lady found me, took me to her home on the bus, her father and her took me to my home in their car. Sat and waited on the step with me till my frantic mother arrived home on the bus, to see if I somehow got there. Can't remember if she alerted police or anyone, I was hugged and reprimanded so much.
Telling kids not to talk to strangers doesn't always work, and I was a shy kid, as you can tell by my bad and good experiences.
It's a tough one, my husband and I were at a market in qld once and we came across a little boy who was obviously lost and terrified. He wouldn't for the life of him let me help him as he kept saying I can't talk to strangers. All we could do was follow him around the market till he found his parents which he did eventually but I was not going to stop following him until he did .
I don’t think anyone from the Bio family was involved, quite frankly I don’t think any of them cared enough to kidnap him, none of them put their hand up to care for either William or his sister, they were ok with strangers fostering him.
I dont think anyone from the Bio family was involved, quite frankly I dont think any of them cared enough to kidnap him, none of them put their hand up to care for either William or his sister, they were ok with strangers fostering him.
Either way, their servers would have a max capacity. They can't go on adding memory endlessly to keep everything current.
This article highlights what I mean, in a much smaller way (smartphone). Imagine how many photos MSM have saved on their system, at any given point in time.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...11/Google-Photo-Memory-Internal-Storage-Space
I'm not sure if that would be correct/be the case in WT's care arrangement.
Quite often, many family members offer, but due to their own history, or being previous enablers/facilitators of the parents, they are rejected as the courts don't see them as being able to prevent further risk of harm or making correct care decisions.
JMHO.
WHEN an eight-month-old *William Tyrrell arrived at the home of his new foster parents, it was an arrangement that was always intended to be permanent.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/n...t/news-story/1f79e414e57cde0d1cfae86cab96115e
I don’t think anyone from the Bio family was involved, quite frankly I don’t think any of them cared enough to kidnap him, none of them put their hand up to care for either William or his sister, they were ok with strangers fostering him.
Possibly, though personally, I find it hard to believe that there was not one single person in the families that was able to offer kincare to William and his sister. Whether that be grandparents, siblings, cousins ..... Brendan's biological father, who they apparently stayed with at some point in time.
It would have been the best way to ensure that William and his sister were not slotted into the permanent care of the Minister, until 18 years old, and/or adopted elsewhere.
The care arrangement was always intended to be permanent.
To me, that says that no-one was ever going to step up to the mark, by agreement. Clean up their act, if that was the kincare issue. Take on the financial/emotional/physical aspects ... while the biological parent(s) cleaned up their own act.
Though, I have to say, I have sometimes wondered if the foster parents weren't some kind of twice-removed, three-times removed relation of the biological parents.
So, I need to agree with kiwi. No motive for anyone close to the family to abduct William imo.
.
I'm not sure if that would be correct/be the case in WT's care arrangement.
Quite often, many family members offer, but due to their own history, or being previous enablers/facilitators of the parents, they are rejected as the courts don't see them as being able to prevent further risk of harm or making correct care decisions.
JMHO.