Seems like a lot of people here give MM a pass because she's a cute young girl. Nobody gives SS or AM the same credit, because they both claim to have changed and both testified. But we all know that they didn't tell us everything. I see MM in the same light. I have no doubt what she has said might be at least partially true, its what she isn't saying that bothers me. We know from Smich's text to Millard that she was at Maple Gate on July 3rd, and as she was taking pics with the iPad on the 4th its reasonable to assume that she was there during the murder. The fact that the crown did not even broach the subject of the 3rd tells me that whatever she said about that day was not only not helpful to the prosecution, but was likely not believable. I find it very hard to believe that a shooting death could occur in a residential home without another occupant of that home at least hearing or sensing something had happened. Same thing with the burning of the body, If Smich was going to confine her to the car, why bring her at all?
Let me ask all of you how you can be certain that MM didn't see LBs dead body at Maple Gate, and how you can be certain she didn't help with the disposal of the body? People are curious by nature. You hear what sounds like a gunshot from upstairs, you go up and see what happened. Your boyfriend tells you they are testing an incinerator, you ask "why do I have to wait in the car?". Her entire story makes little to no sense if you think about how a normal person would react if put in her situation.