The writing is on the wall now .... she will be gunning for GEORGE again ... maybe he is still a willing participant though, who knows?
So .... she is going to play the part of the VICTIM - survivor of child abuse, and counsellor to other abuse victims. That's as creative as Greene saying she could be a paralegal -- the best he has ever known.
page 14 in the footnote, about her doing hypnosis and recalling memories of child abuse which she had suppressed. They say "It is widely reported that Ms. Anthony was the victim of child abuse."
"She would be barred from working as a "victim's advocate with the Court system" - page 13
[didn't Baez say he was going to be a victim's advocate for the wife of the man run over by the drunk driver?
"well-known executive chef killed in a hit and run crash" - "Stefano Ricciolettis widow, Patrizia Pesce, is working with attorney Jose Baez on the civil litigation against the accused driver and a local night club"
"Baez said he will also be acting as a victims advocate for the family during in the criminal case."]
"She wouldn't be able to accept plane fare and hotel accommodations so she could travel and counsel other victims of child abuse."
So, they realize that a regular interview on any of the networks will not fly with the public, so they have to MARKET her as a victim of child abuse to sell her "time", and books, and counselling interviews. Move over Dr. Drew!
Is this the best they got, for re-packaging the most hated woman in the world, for a big bucks interview disguised as a keynote speaker on child abuse?
Well, everyone has a right to make a living, even people like Casey. I do feel there are things she could have done and maybe to some extent still could do to help herself in the eyes of many citizens, but she is not doing any of it and in fact her keepers seem to have done just the opposite when they have done anything at all.
A few apologies here and there might help. Some gratitude wouldn't hurt also, considering how much the unusual person has taken from so many people. Bankruptcy to get "a fresh start" is okay by me, but deceiving the court in the process is not going to earn her and her enablers any Brownie points with most people.
Sadly though, much of the problem with the whole packaging and marketing of this unusual person is that our world has in it too many people who are willing to listen--some citizens believe everything they hear in the media, others don't believe but listen anyway 'just in case a truth slips out' (which in and of itself is just plain laughable).
You can't sell something people refuse to buy. Many people claim they are sickened by what they hear, yet they continue to listen to every single word that is uttered by anyone in Camp Casey or in the media--even though their words are usually just an attempt to restir the pot.
Casey's BK lawyer argues that you can't go after property (income) that has not yet "been created" but Casey's bankruptcy filing lists debts that have not actually "been created." To me, this response just looks like another in a series of attempts for the Casey team to have it both ways. And I have little doubt that our laws probably allow them that.
One thing I really can see the BK court being able to do, though, is to make sure Casey's filing has every "i" dotted and every "t" crossed and if they find anything amiss, bring the hammer down. As far as I know, our laws DO allow for prosecution of a person who lies (or intentionally omits pertinent information) in a bankruptcy proceeding.
