'Boy in the Box' cop says he's clean (alleged cocaine)

Discussion in 'Up to the Minute' started by crypto6, Dec 25, 2006.

  1. crypto6

    crypto6 New Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A highly regarded homicide detective who tested positive for cocaine last week and then retired said yesterday that he has never used illegal drugs, but was forced to leave the police department because he could not fight the drug-test result.

    Thomas Augustine, who is 60 and said he takes two medications for high blood pressure, was informed Dec. 14 that he came up "hot" for cocaine. He submitted for retirement the next day.

    "I've never used drugs," he said.

    http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/16303312.htm
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Opie

    Opie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    92,405
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I can't help but wonder if this man's test results were mixed up with someone else's. I can't imagine (maybe I am naive) why anyone at his age and with his record would become involved in illegal drugs. Other thoughts?
     
  4. julianne

    julianne Former Member

    Messages:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I remember being told long ago that Advil, well ANY ibuprofen, comes up on a UA (urine analysis) as THC, which is marijuana. I don't know if it's true or not---but I do know of a guy who smoked pot and he had to do a drug test and he passed. He wrote down that he had been taking Advil.
     
  5. southcitymom

    southcitymom New Member

    Messages:
    16,021
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is not true for the vast majority of recognized, accepted urine screen tests.
     
  6. AlwaysShocked

    AlwaysShocked Active Member

    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I agree, NSAIDs (Advil, Ibuprofen, Motrin) do NOT show up as THC on urine tests!

    Also, this gentleman couls submit a hair sample for hair analysis testing that would show any and all drugs used (or not used) over the past 3-6 months if he wants to clear this up. The hair tests are able to detect cocaine, among other drugs.

    But his lawyer would most likely have already told him this.
     
  7. close_enough

    close_enough Inactive

    Messages:
    14,956
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, I CAN'T GET THE CAPS OFF YET....LOL///


    SHE'S BEAUTIFUL..SMOKES A PACK DAY, WAIT, THAT'S ME
    ...I CAN T GET THE CAPS OFF....LOL
    \

    PULLS HER HAIR BACK, AS SHE SCREAMS.... :dance:
     
  8. close_enough

    close_enough Inactive

    Messages:
    14,956
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I Can't Get This Off??


    YEAH....
     
  9. Opie

    Opie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    92,405
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Most likely this man's lawyer has told him about the hair test mentioned above, but the retiring policeman is 60 years old and a prolonged fight over this would be extremely stressful and not really worth it at his age. Many police officers do not work until age 60, but retire much earlier for various reasons.

    The hospital department in which I worked terminated the jobs of 4 women over age 50 all in the same week. Sheer coincidence? Sure! A court fight against such a large institution would have taken much $$$$ and way too much stress, and even if they were successful, they would probably have been of retirement age by the time it was settled anyway. Would the possible $$$$ settlement have been worth it? Not to me. Maybe that's the way this man felt, who knows?
     
  10. AlwaysShocked

    AlwaysShocked Active Member

    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    But why have one's highly respected career end on such a down note when there is an easy way - a hair analysis test - to end any speculation?

    Perhaps the now-retired officer will do just this and then share the results so that at least his fellow officers will know the results.

    By the way, in the accompanying article, there is a statement "the cocaine level was very high". This statement indicates that the amount of the substance was "quantified", meaning the urine specimen was shipped off to a lab and a gas chromatology test was performed. This type of testing is very accurate, as opposed to "on-site" tests where a "dip stick" type of technology is used. The on-site tests cannot quantify the amount of the substance, just show presence or absence of certain metabolytes in the urine.

    The hair analysis tests also cannot quantify, but are very accurate for detecting the stored metabolytes. Also, any body hair can be used, doesn't have to be from the head - can be from armpit, chest, leg or....wherever!
     
  11. crypto6

    crypto6 New Member

    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Looking at reviewed literature (not blurbs on "passyourdrugtest.com) on Pubmed from the National Library of Medicine, things are looking bad for our boy. The article spilling the beans implies there were two tests, and I assume the confirmatory was a more specific, and costly, test. For substances giving false positives on tiered tests, passive contact with and passive inhalation of cocaine are all I could find in my first runthrough. My common sense tells me there have to be more; I'll keep looking
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice