Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #16

[DianeB]

Yes, that is the affidavit with most of the email exchanges. The specific email about p***ing is on P. 13.

 

[Medea]

Good questions. I´ve been thinking what AR wrote about them (Juv. 2 & AR) having sex and how she described the language she used. I would think that it is not that common to "talk dirty" while having sex at that age? And I mean it was really dirty! Maybe I´m just older than I think...

If I had to guess, I would guess that AR was probably promiscuious, Jacques seems to encourage this and it totally fits with the profile of many child sexual abuse victims who see their only 'value' and means of 'control' in using sex.

But, we don't know if she really said this to Juvenile 2, or just told what she knew they wanted to hear.

But, we have to remember that AR's behavior is totally off the wall even for a 14 year old who was having conensual sex with a peer, Jacques has been grooming her to what HE wants, so it isn't surprising that she would have been exposed to 'dirty talk' worthy of a *advertiser censored* flick as well as who knows what other types of sexual acts that no normal 14 year old and her 15/16/17 year old boyfriend would even be contemplating.

 

[VTNance]

I didn't mean to imply I had negative or hostile intent toward you.

:blowkiss:

Thanks. :blowkiss: Sorry if I was touchy, this is such a grisly horrible case and quite close to home.

You are quite correct in your assessment of MJ's "training."

 

[Cornflower]

You just weren't raised by a twisted pervert.

Sorry, I meant that wasn´t Juvenile 2 surprised that a 14 yo girl uses that kind of language? If he wasn´t he might well have some kind of connection to the events.

 

[Morag]

According to MSNBC (on now), the Ramsey have been cleared because of DNA analysis. DA has met with JR and apologized.

 

[VTNance]

Hold on a second, something just clicked for me. How was DRIED semen going to be put on her panties??? Can someone explain that to me? Did they take the handkerchief and wipe the panties on it??? I guess I cannot reconcile this in my mind.

I may be wrong about this, but I thought what was found was her panties, with dried blood on them, and the hanky/tissue/Kleenex with the semen on it....no semen in the panties. And, of course, the baggie!

 

[MrsMush99]

Sorry, I meant that wasn´t Juvenile 2 surprised that a 14 yo girl uses that kind of language? If he wasn´t he might well have some kind of connection to the events.

You'd be surprised what 14 year olds are up to nowadays. I have a 14 yo daughter and the things she tells me that goes on with a couple girls that were in her class would make your hair stand up.

 

[nanandjim]

Good questions. I´ve been thinking what AR wrote about them (Juv. 2 & AR) having sex and how she described the language she used. I would think that it is not that common to "talk dirty" while having sex at that age? And I mean it was really dirty! Maybe I´m just older than I think...

I do not think that it is normal. Those thoughts would not enter a child's mind. It was a perverted adult putting those words and thoughts into her young mind. Geez...poor girl. What was this guy (J2) thinking of her? I wonder if he had a close relationship with MJ? He is a victim, unless I read otherwise.

 

[twinkiesmom]

Why kill her? Why did they have to kill her? Did she know something? Was it just for their pleasure? If so, how many more are there we may not know about? :furious:

It was either part of the depravity or to silence the victim/coverup. One or the other or both....to suggest it was accidental is ridiculous.

 

[MrsMush99]

I may be wrong about this, but I thought what was found was her panties, with dried blood on them, and the hanky/tissue/Kleenex with the semen on it....no semen in the panties. And, of course, the baggie!

Oh man, I'm so confused, LOL. Someone mentioned the panties having semen on them that's why I asked that question. We need a FACTS ONLY thread. So we can go there to see what we know FOR SURE that is undisputed.

 

[CarpeDiem]

I may be wrong about this, but I thought what was found was her panties, with dried blood on them, and the hanky/tissue/Kleenex with the semen on it....no semen in the panties. And, of course, the baggie!

That was my understanding also. But, upon reading again, the handkerchief contained blood and semen, the underwear is described as torn, nothing further. That's page 15 of the last document on 's link, titled "Brooke Bennett Affid . ."

http://www.websleuths.com//bennett/

 

[Chica]

:angel:

Just a FYI:



http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65798


Inviting outside Contact:

Thanks Adalena...I must have forgotten!

 

[MrsMush99]

:angel:

Thanks Adalena...I must have forgotten!

We're fine Chica. Christine said we did nothing wrong.

 

[Dante7]

The spot is in a wooded area, near the old sugarhouse, so I doubt it was used as a legitimate killing spot in everyday life on the farm. A place like that would be situated much closer to the main outbuildings.

'kay. Didn't know what the exact location looked like.

So why the use of the term? I'd suppose now that they didn't mean anything deeper than just to mean the spot he'd selected to take her to to kill her, not meaning to imply prior use for anything else.


Otherwise, as I'd mentioned, we'd have know something about it.

 

[Cornflower]

You'd be surprised what 14 year olds are up to nowadays. I have a 14 yo daughter and the things she tells me that goes on with a couple girls that were in her class would make your hair stand up.

I understand that it is way different today Still, I remember having one or two classmates who were more sexually active than the most of us. But I recall that they weren´t looked up to and what they did wasn´t something all the others wanted to do too.

I don´t have children of my own so there sure is much I have no idea

 

[Dante7]

Some males (including several family members) just automatically give me the heebie jeebies.

Hey, I tend to give some people the heebie-jeebies and I've never raped or murdered anyone...

 

[Adalena935]

That's what I think...delusions of gradeuer. A freaking google search could have told him that his fake messages would be detected if the police ever put a computer forensic specialist on it. His entire retarded plan was predicated on him, a sex offender, never being suspected and everything being taken wholly at face value.

But, that assumes he didn't intend to keep Brooke alive, he might have been planning to force her to log on and make some calls to substantiated that she 'went to Texas'...so who knows.

I suppose it's anybody's guess whether he intended to keep her alive beyond that day or not. Unless he flew her to TX & had her log on from a computer there his efforts would've been for naught anyway.

I think he kidnapped her to murder her that day. He blogged some of his bogus stuff prior to the kidnap date if I recall. I'd have to check affidavits again, transcribe again, etc. I know, maybe if we worked on memorizing all the affidavits and page numbers. hey, just kidding. lol

 

[MrsMush99]

I understand that it is way different today Still, I remember having one or two classmates who were more sexually active than the most of us. But I recall that they weren´t looked up to and what they did wasn´t something all the others wanted to do too.

I don´t have children of my own so there sure is much I have no idea

Thankfully Cornflower, my daughter gets disgusted by these girls. One girl actually came up to her and said she might be pregnant! Can you even imagine?? Of course it was not true, but she is definitely sexually active and shares it with whoever wants it and whoever will listen.

 

[Adalena935]

:angel:

Thanks Adalena...I must have forgotten!

It was my mistake and I've been corrected.

 

[DeltaDawn]

Delta Dawn

I dunno if this is the affidavit that you are looking for that mentioned Denise :
http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Jacques_affidavit.pdf

Thank you..yes that is the one!

DD :blowkiss: