I just went back and read the entire discussion about what the convenience store employee said that day. To anyone who is NOT an RVer, RT’s comment (as recalled by the employee) and subsequent actions described by the employee sound very odd. Those of us with experience RVing did not view any of it as odd. The RVers seemed to prevail eventually but those members who were really suspicious of RT at the time still thought the whole thing was suspicious no matter what was said. I’m not going to recap it here so we don’t get into round two of that discussion. But there was really nothing to see there, especially now that Barb has been found close to where she was last seen by RT.
bbm
Agreed.
Now that she's been found, the VI who said that he heard LE had photos of Barbara on that last day of her life --has LE allowed him to see the photos ?
The VI mentioned photos but that he hadn't been shown them by LE.
The public doesn't need to know everything, but I'd think Barbara's family might want questions answered.
Just my .02.
There were many questions from the start that LE kept close to the vest; and may have had people scratching their heads and that's natural.
It's not that people were overly suspicious but LE never came out and said anyone was cleared, so there's that.
It'd be good to hear from LE how close she was found to the rock formation -- rather than from a family member -- as that would be official.
The same way we all rely on msm for an accurate report.
LE have not said where exactly she was and also why the searchers missed her when they used HRD dogs.
If, let's say, she was close as in a mile (& LE have not said she was that close), how did they miss her ?
I'm interested in what clothing was found with her as well as which shoes and did she have a drink container with her as described ?
So many questions.
But I believe LE know this.
So there's still hope that there'll be answers for Barbara's son and the VI (Barbara's nephew).
MOO