- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 4,508
- Reaction score
- 21,012
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
1m
The jury is back, and Holmes' attorney is back to pointing to some more Theranos master verification plan documents -- this batch is specific to Theranos' use of Siemens Advia 1800 blood-testing devices.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
23m
Gangakhedkar says in 2013 ex-Theranos lab director Adam Rosendorff "didn’t go into all of the details" of Theranos' device launch or the plan to use Siemens' devices when he met with her. Wade: He was not concerned with the approach? Gangakhedkar: That was my understanding.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
7m
Holmes' atty asks Gangakhedkar if the plan was to focus on validating a few assays on Theranos' Edison devices and then roll out more in "phases." She replies "I don’t recall the entirety of the plan." He points to an Aug 21 2013 email she wrote mentioning the phased approach.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
2m
Holmes' atty brings up Balwani's 2013 email to Gangakhedkar criticizing her team for not working through the night like the software team. Wade says Balwani was "essentially boast[ing] about the oppressive hours his team was working, as though that was a badge of honor."
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
1m
Wade on Balwani: He’s trying to make you feel guilty for the fact you weren't working then wasn’t he?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Wade: He’s trying to make your whole team feel guilty?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Wade: You were frustrated by that?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
5m
Wade asks Gangakhedkar if she was deeply offended by Balwani. She replies that his criticism of her team was a "common theme." Wade asks if the witness is aware Balwani criticized Holmes. She replies she was not, but the gov't objects and the judge sustains the objection.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
3m
Wade points out that Gangakhedkar was so upset by Balwani's email that she replied to him defending her team's hard work, and resigned 3 days later. He notes that Holmes was surprised and she asked Gangakhedkar if there was anything they could do to keep her, but she said no.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
1m
On redirect now. Robert Leach is up for the gov't, asking Gangakhedkar if she conveyed her reliability concerns about Theranos' Edison 3.0 and 3.5 with Holmes when she quit. She says she did.
https://twitter.com/doratki/status/1440401469237202957
1m
The jury is back, and Holmes' attorney is back to pointing to some more Theranos master verification plan documents -- this batch is specific to Theranos' use of Siemens Advia 1800 blood-testing devices.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
23m
Gangakhedkar says in 2013 ex-Theranos lab director Adam Rosendorff "didn’t go into all of the details" of Theranos' device launch or the plan to use Siemens' devices when he met with her. Wade: He was not concerned with the approach? Gangakhedkar: That was my understanding.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
7m
Holmes' atty asks Gangakhedkar if the plan was to focus on validating a few assays on Theranos' Edison devices and then roll out more in "phases." She replies "I don’t recall the entirety of the plan." He points to an Aug 21 2013 email she wrote mentioning the phased approach.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
2m
Holmes' atty brings up Balwani's 2013 email to Gangakhedkar criticizing her team for not working through the night like the software team. Wade says Balwani was "essentially boast[ing] about the oppressive hours his team was working, as though that was a badge of honor."
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
1m
Wade on Balwani: He’s trying to make you feel guilty for the fact you weren't working then wasn’t he?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Wade: He’s trying to make your whole team feel guilty?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Wade: You were frustrated by that?
Gangakhedkar: Yes.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
5m
Wade asks Gangakhedkar if she was deeply offended by Balwani. She replies that his criticism of her team was a "common theme." Wade asks if the witness is aware Balwani criticized Holmes. She replies she was not, but the gov't objects and the judge sustains the objection.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
3m
Wade points out that Gangakhedkar was so upset by Balwani's email that she replied to him defending her team's hard work, and resigned 3 days later. He notes that Holmes was surprised and she asked Gangakhedkar if there was anything they could do to keep her, but she said no.
Dorothy Atkins@doratki·
1m
On redirect now. Robert Leach is up for the gov't, asking Gangakhedkar if she conveyed her reliability concerns about Theranos' Edison 3.0 and 3.5 with Holmes when she quit. She says she did.
https://twitter.com/doratki/status/1440401469237202957
Last edited: